.
JADE’S ADDITIONAL POSTS IN THIS SERIES:

Corruption, State-Sponsored Murder & Twelve Angry Men
Jodi Arias: Justice Denied
Michael Melendez – Perjury Exposed
The Presumption of Innocence
The Immaculate Deception – Exposed

© 2015: Jade & Jodi Arias Is Innocent .com – All Rights Reserved.
Any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of this document is strictly prohibited.
*** Click the links above to share this page on your favorite social media sites ***
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Jodi is not going to receive any form of justice until this case emerges from the rat infested sewer it originated in.

Anyone who thinks Stephens was just exercising her “style” and letting the lawyers try their case, I couldn’t disagree more. The unmistakeable fact is that she doesn’t have a clue about what the fuck she’s doing.

She didn’t belong on this case any more than a welder should be doing brain surgery. This was a capital case. It requires totally different temperament and courtroom administration exceptionalism, with extraordinary knowledge in case law precedent in death penalty cases.

Just the bajillion sidebars should tell anyone she was exponentially pathetic. You put a judge on the bench that has never in her life presided over a death penalty trial for one of the most publicized cases in the last 50 years? A defendant who is indigent and must count on her constitutional rights to a fair trial being litigated by the lowest level of representation afforded by the legal system?

It’s obvious going in that it’s going to be the David versus Goliath premier death camp Nazi against a public defender. And this Einstein decision is made to have a rookie trainee get on-the-job training at the expense of the fate of Jodi Arias’ life or death? Whatsa matter? Couldn’t you find a more inexperienced one? The deck was already stacked from day one.

She’s more qualified to be a grease monkey at Jiffy Lube. You unscrew the plug, the oil comes out, you put the plug back in. That’s something they could train her for and with enough practice I think it’s something she could probably master. But in a courtroom, she’s as useless as a book in braille on high-wire walking.

As just one example in probably over a hundred others, this is the “judge” who overruled an objection when Jodi was asked, if someone was wearing socks and was tromping around in blood on a carpet, would it look like what was shown in the photograph at the end of the hallway? Nurmi objected. Stephens blurts out “overruled!”

In other words, Jodi is a qualified blood expert who can testify what sock prints are supposed to look like in a carpet that has blood on it? I almost fell out of my chair? Ten out of ten other capital case judges would have sustained that objection. Just this example alone shows she is an embarrassment to the rotation roster of any judge circuit. She must think that little hammer is for cracking walnuts.

She did everything for Martinez except give him a lap dance. And she probably did that at lunch. She let the Alexanders run the courtroom and did everything for them except put them on the jury. Asked and answered is a foreign concept to her. The only person that could have been more bellicose than Martinez was in the courtroom, is Al Sharpton. And his pacing back and forth like a chimpanzee wearing a path in the carpet, had her googly eyed and transfixed. Either that or she was using the monitors on her desk to watch soap operas and keeping tabs on her appointments at the hair salons.

Sidebars are supposed to be for issues where attorneys appear about to broach testimony that may be more prejudicial than probative. Or to seek guidance on exhibits that are about to be offered for admittance. They shouldn’t be like a quarterback going into a huddle after every play. The balance of judges discourage an extensive number of sidebars, because it can alienate or bore a jury. Plus it’s by it’s very nature, secretive from the triers of fact and can influence opinion of who a judge favors.

After all, the judge is supposed to be a referee who can make rulings from the bench without little gossip parties needed for the slightest damn objection. Also the attorneys are supposed to know the boundaries they must stay within as part of being qualified by the BAR.

The time spent in sidebars in these two trials, probably equals 60% of the total time presenting and arguing the case. She simply didn’t know how to rule on objections and the overwhelming balance of objections overruled, went against the defense.

There is little doubt in my mind that when the transcripts of these sidebars are released, there is going to be even MORE evidence of error that will be fodder for appeal. And I’d also bet the farm it will be more than harmless error. Some of the best ammunition for her incompetence in preserving Jodi’s rights may be in those sidebars or the in camera daily rituals, which were almost as frequent.

Air purifier manufacturers boast that their purifiers can filter 99.7% of the particulates out of the air. That’s the same percentage of likelihood that Stephens will give Jodi anything but life without parole. And I’m probably being too generous to even give her that much benefit of the doubt.

Jodi shouldn’t even dignify prostrating herself for “leniency” and having her pretend to listen. Don’t even give her the satisfaction to ignore it. She will gloat just that much more when she pronounces sentence and tells Jodi she will spend the rest of her life in prison. Piss on her. Just make it as unsatisfying for as possible. She almost cried when the first jury didn’t come back with death.

This is the judge who rolled her eyes at Nurmi after putting him through about five different attempts to just have a relatively inconsequential exhibit admitted. Which was a page torn out of her journal.

Jodi is testifying and identifies where the page was torn out. Foundation? It was HER journal and she’s showing you the ripped page! How much more fucking foundation do you need? The exhibit should have been admitted and frog’s objection should have been overruled. But no, you got to throw up every roadblock possible to make it embarrassing and help your buddy. I posted the link where she does the eyeroll. She’s a prosecution cheerleading leading, hamfisted bitty. She would have had to struggle to contain her jubilation if it wasn’t for Juror 17 spoiling the death verdict celebration party for good.

It has to get totally beyond her ability to interfere. And to the level where SHE is judged by those who set the wrongs right. Appeals courts are loathe to overturn verdicts and it is seldom in any appealed trial, that there hasn’t been prosecutor misconduct or error that is seriously borderline reversible. But they give deference to the judge in most cases and dial it down to harmless error, because the judge has made SOME documented effort to remediate the grievances. Here, this witch hasn’t done ANYTHING. Not one single thing!

There hasn’t been one reprimand or even a dress-down in front of the jury. Not one sanction. Not a small fine, not even the teensiest damn WARNING in open court. She is appraised of one blatant violation of juris ethics after the other. His phony family members are doing everything but waving at the jurors to make sure they see them cry and make swirly eyes on cue.

A crucial element of evidence is deliberately thrown to the floor, which is already damaged. She says nothing. She even has Martinez sarcastically telling her how to conduct her rulings. Try that with other competent judges and see where you end up. Nurmi presents her with case law that is right on point for mistrial motions and sanctions, and it’s summarily ignored.

The little pencil dick blurts out the name of what should have been–as declared and on the record prior to his affidavit being read–a protected, anonymous witness. And he says his name three separate times within 5 minutes. Does the phony act of being frustrated with himself after the second time–and then a minute later, he says it again! Accidental my ass. And she just sits there on the bench like a cannabis tripping twit.

Instead of keeping the testimony focused on the 35 years of experience of a domestic violence expert, she lets it devolve into a Romper Room laughathon about Sneezy, Dopey, and Grumpy’s heritage and family tree. Jodi would have had a better chance at a fair trial if there was a small claims court judge.

This is what is going to make the difference, when the appeal court judges look for what steps were taken to assume control, take corrective action and keep the trial fair for the defendant. Here, it’s been virtually non existent. These judges will not like that. And the cumulative effect of showing bias against the defendant, will be overwhelming.

There is something we may be forgetting that came out in testimony in the penalty trial that is extraordinarily pertinent to the first trial. It is regarding the virtual pornucopia of smut. There is no denying now, that there was porn galore on his computer. It’s proven and so is the perjury trying to cover it up. And this is just what Alexander hadn’t gotten to erase yet, or preserve somewhere in a private hiding place. He would have been whipping those nineteen trace cleaners into action furiously.

Before the guilt trial started, Stephens ruled against the admission of the letters that Jodi said were sent to her by Travis, ADMITTING his perversion. This was blockbuster error. Because now we know that those letters (and letters that Nurmi had authenticated by a handwriting expert) were authentic and those letters should have been ADMITTED. Martinez went postal to keep them out, and no wonder. They put the nails right in Alexander’s coffin and would have blew the State’s case of bullshit sky high. Proving that Jodi had not conjured up a fairytale spin story and would have devastated the daily theme of painting her as a serial liar .

Childvilla.com wasn’t a site where you buy men’s shoes. Or a site where you would find something you needed to brush up on for the next Mormon church services. It was a kiddie site. And porn watching was his passion–almost as much as his playing women full time, like the gigolo he was.

If they were not original letters, but it was still HIS handwriting, then he wrote the goddamned things. And those letters would have been her emperical proof that validated what she knew. And more so, what he couldn’t possibly afford to have be known. I don’t recall seeing him in the courtroom to affirm that it was his voice on the tape recording. But that was accepted that it was him, wasn’t it Stephens.

When somebody receives a fax, is that a copy? Yet that is accepted as a legal document in every venue I am aware of. Banks and mortgage companies verify signatures using fax copies. And they do it every day. They sure as hell aren’t originals. Forged documents can be identified and exposed easily by handwriting experts with comparative samples and exemplars. Stephens prevented Jodi her right to argue those letters. And we don’t need any more proof than what was on his hard drive that they WEREN’T forged.

And need I remind anybody who is still deluded that her testimony was a rehearsed concoction of lies–about the polygraph test she was willing to take and have admitted? Take the best pathological liar you know and let me set them up with an expert examiner. I’ll show you a pathological liar who fails the polygraph test. The U.S Secret Service uses them and per the Director who just testified in congress recently, he said they use them “extensively.” Even relying on them heavily in their hiring process.

So if you think polygraphs are easy to fake, maybe you should speak to them. They protect the president! If you think that’s not a good enough endorsement of their reliability, I’m wasting my time talking to you. And need I remind you too, that polygraph results are admissible in Arizona if both defense and prosecution stipulate to it? But guess who the chicken was. You can recognize him by his beak.

There are so many examples of blunders by Stephens, that I would need a file system and a secretary to keep track. I especially loved the numerous times she would say–ove…ove…overruled. As if she just woke up from a trance and hadn’t been paying any attention at all to the testimony. Nurmi should have said, sorry…don’t mean to be disturbing your nap there judge.

I would love to know how many judges were astonished at your daily ineptitude and rolling their eyes at you Stephens. To say nothing about the time you pissed away coming close to almost not having enough alternates left to deliberate–which ironically would have made me let out a whoop you could hear at 35,000 feet. Too bad, you couldn’t have been just a little more pathetic. You came close.

Arizona if you’re not scrambling to the voting booth to make her an ex-judge in 2016, it’s like putting a drunk at the pole position in the Indy 500. If you don’t think it’s worth investing the effort, I hope she presides over a trial that involves you. Maybe then my point will be more clear.

When the decision process finally DOES get beyond this covert hand-picked prosecution plant, the appeal briefs should be written by a consummate wordsmith. The first thing I would bring to the court’s attention is the long known den of iniquity this county attorney’s office is, that filed the case. And I would highlight the evidence-withholding Milke comparisons that were proven, and could only have been a result of perjury IN THIS CASE also. And from this very same state prosecutor’s office.

I would put it in verbal neon lights. I would have them know that this prosecutor is a familiar name for his misconduct before the Arizona Supreme Court. And here he is again. This time for one of the most notorious trials in Arizona history. This county is already well known and famous for its pattern and practice. And I would make it eminently clear, this case originates from the same swamp.

I would point out that this is the same M.C.A.O, that when Milke’s attorneys requested all the personnel files of the testifying detective who was held up as a model of honesty for the police department. That same detective was found to have committed perjury by four other district courts–and in addition, four more courts cited him for violations of the Miranda warning.

When the personnel records of this detective were subpoenaed–they turned over TWO years of his reviews to the defense. Only one problem–he held his detective’s job for TWENTY ONE years. The years of those withheld files contained all the exculpatory secrets. They also casually forgot to mention to the defense that he was suspended for five days for sexually imposing himself on a motorist he stopped, and then lied to his supervisors about that ever happening. Yet, it resulted in his five days suspension.

And THIS is the DA’s office we are to trust is interested in the truth? I would in fact make the pdf of the Mike case an appendage to the brief, for the amazing similarities of a lying detective and similar violations of Brady and Giglio. These astonishing blunders were also supplanted by that State court judge who presided over THAT trial, and the post conviction proceedings. Apparently, amazing as it is to comprehend, Stephens has a Superior Court twin neophyte. Maybe they trained each other.

Although it may be tempting to make this a stem to stern assemblage of the laundry list of errors, it should elicit only select egregious instances of error by this so–called judge. The ideal goal should be that the judge panel finds it so egregious, it deems it worthy of oral argument. Which gives you a whole new venue of opportunity. It should be such that when the appellate judges get to the final paragraph, they are stunned with the constitutional abridgements to Jodi’s right to a fair trial. And it shouldn’t be hard to do.

It starts almost from day one and prompted Nurmi to file the timely motions for mistrial almost every few days. Mistrial motions that were supported by case citings of appropriate law. And which in THOSE cases required a remedy to correct the infractions. What the hell is case law for Stephens, if not to establish demand that judges follow it? Case law is not a suggestion that Supreme Courts just hand down for rulings in their spare time. It becomes the fucking law! Did you get that memo? What part of that is difficult for you to process?

Few trials would have had such a compendium of boners by a Superior Court judge. It traverses the full gamut. It starts with the premise that, essentially, evidence that was withheld or never turned over by the prosecution, should have been examined anyway by the defense. Un-fucking believable. It’s just got to leave your head spinning. I guess Nurmi should have consulted a psychic to find out what evidence Martinez was hiding.

It continues all the way to letting jurors play with their digital toys during lapses in the trial. Why not just save them a lot of trouble and set up a TV in the jury waiting room and put it on HLN.

No doesn’t sequester them, just relies on violators raising their hands. Violators who would volunteer information to get them kicked off a trial they can write a book about, go on media shows or get paid for juicy inside information interviews by tabloid rags. But their value to these rags is only worth something, if they go all the way through deliberations. This is like asking someone if they would like to give you their winning Powerball lottery ticket. Ugh.

Then she gives a modification to an Allen Charge when two of the three conditions that prohibit you in Arizona from giving a modified instruction, couldn’t be more blatantly existing in THIS case.

1) Judge is not supposed to know what the vote split is.

Uhm, if it’s eleven jurors signing the note complaining that one juror–JUROR 17 won’t deliberate….uh knock knock, hel-l-l-o….only you could be so stupid Stephens that you wouldn’t know what the split was.

Hence, violation one.

2) Not supposed to single out any one juror for their views or their vote. Uhm….Einstein, see #1.

Violation two.

So it was impossible not to know BEFORE you gave the modified instruction, that you were giving it I-L-L-E-G-A-L-L-Y per the Arizona statute.

Yet, nothing like giving it the old prosecution push for your miniature perjury suborning death-titillated serpent driving the scat train. Isn’t that right Stephens. Of course you had a lot of practice ignoring those rules, you did the same thing in the first trial. It must have made you all giggly and fuzzy inside, until they all still remained stubborn. Two tries at death and came up snake eyes. Probably went back to your chambers, threw your iPhone down and said, shit!

I think there may be enough for serious consideration to remand a retrial, that just due to the fact that almost until the actual start of the trial, the defense was under the impression that the prosecution was going to present evidence that the shot was first. In agreement with the defense. When this was changed, it turned the entire defense case inside out.

If this kind of surprise trick is pulled on a defense during the course of trial, it is known as sandbagging. Which at the minimum often requires stiff sanctions, and in the extreme, can force a mistrial depending on the seriousness. If this wasn’t a case of sandbagging, I don’t know what was. And it couldn’t have been more serious.

What Martinez did was move the eight ball from in front of the pocket, when it was the defense’s turn to shoot and win the game. And then put it BACK, using the gunshot against her–AFTER–he got the one qualifying aggravator through the perjury of Flores, with the Chronis hearing judge. They won a trial motion proffered to the judge based on a fraud on the court.

This has to be spelled out to perfection in the brief. And hopefully Nurmi filed a request for delay of trial motion at the very least, to preserve the outrage and the error. Any top defense attorney would have claimed this as blatant blindsiding, preventing Jodi from receiving an adequately prepared defense. It is inextricably linked to her version of events as self defense, and torpedoed the prosecution case. Any legal high court authority should be able to spot this immediately and conclude the reason was to sandbag the defense. And because the State’s case was in deep, deep trouble. It won’t pass the laugh test, let alone the smell test.

A defendant’s rights must be preserved to have sufficient time to defend against the case as set out by a prosecution, to adequately prepare. It cannot be a guessing game that they have to figure out the evidence to be presented against their client at the start of trial. What if all prosecutors did that? It would be chaos. They could fix the evidence around the facts and lie to hearing officers in pre-trial hearings to win their motions.

A prosecution has a duty to be above board and seek only the truth, wherever it leads. It cannot play “gotcha” or hide-the-ball. Brady case law expressly forbids it. I think this is going to be a monumental consideration before the Supremes, if it gets that far. And if this is explained in precision-grade detail, this may be enough to flip the case in itself.

We know the autopsy photos were used strictly to ingrain animosity against Jodi with gratuitous graphics. It’s just another of the litany of courtroom antics by an unhinged, deranged pros-e-tator, that wasn’t reigned in by an inept judge.

The neck wound didn’t look remotely as it was demonically planned, with intent to incite the desired reaction. And it was even left on the Elmo machine, projecting on the giant screen (which Martinez plotted) as he strolled up to the bench for one of the five or ten minute sidebar du jours of the hour.

When an autopsy is done, a “body block” is used. It is a block of hard plastic or rubber and it is placed under the back to make the chest protrude when the Y incision is made from the shoulders and the straight line down to the pelvis, resembling the letter “Y.” This is to better aide the examination of the chest cavity and the organs of the subject.

When the back is raised, it automatically makes the chin fall back and the neck distends to it’s fullest. This is what caused the large gaping appearance of the neck wound and was conveyed to the jurors as being the natural unenhanced condition of the sliced throat. And for them to assume it was without any manipulation to embellish it.

It was rotten, sick, prejudicial to the defendant being used in the manner and frequency that it was, and most judges would have prohibited this obvious gratuitous ploy. It is deserving of a Nancy Grace Award for being as revulsing as she is.

It was deliberate. It was of course designed to inflame the jury. And here’s how that desired photo was achieved, to emblazon the most possible visceral resentment against Jodi into the memory of the jurors.

But this is also a grenade that exploded right in Martinez’ crotch. Because it CONFIRMS something else. In the dragging photo, if he was at that angle and his throat was already cut, the same effect would have been INEVITABLE. And would have caused his head to fall back as we see above in the throat photo. It would have had to reveal at least the top of his forehead and it would be visible. It’s proof POSITIVE that his throat was not cut in this photo!

In fact, if his head was not supported as it was on the autopsy table, it would have more than likely flopped back EVEN MORE at that angle he was laying. Because there was virtually nothing holding it intact in the front anymore. The weight of his head at that angle, gravity would have made it flop back almost like a “hinge.

Click to view full size image in a new window

So the same evidence created by manipulation in the autopsy to create the worst possible image to implant on the jury, totally screws the prosecution’s theory. Let anybody explain the impossibility of why that photo does not replicate what the body-block causes it to do on the autopsy table you T-Dogg boot licking oafs. Gravity doesn’t work today and then not tomorrow. It isn’t possible. That’s why it’s called an impossibility.

Another thing I think should weigh heavily with appeal judges, is the strained relationship (and that’s an understatement) between Jodi and Nurmi, who was designated as her lead attorney. In her long letter to the blonde addlebrain, she details an extraordinary pattern of being ignored and rejected, even though she is forced by indigence to have him appointed to her.

If Nurmi will INDEMNIFY that he refused to take her calls for months at a time–and we know he petitioned the judge HIMSELF at least twice to be removed from her case–I don’t see any way this can be ignored and considered to be effective counsel.

No defendant assigned to a public defender should have to beg to talk to her attorney. Especially when she is facing a death penalty trial! This goes beyond a normal relationship of any client–attorney, where they are excommunicated from having effective access and cannot be involved in evidence consultations and progression of her case.

It is an astounding twelve page account that she lays out, of being shunned by the very person who is supposed to be in concert with her at every stage and to be her strongest advocate.

Instead she is treated as a nuisance, to the point of his secretary being instructed to hang up on her. Despite this obvious dereliction of his duty to provide effective representation, old reliable still refused to let her have new counsel.

Even in FRONT OF THE JURY, he says that he doesn’t like her nine days out of ten. There is no way this cannot almost guarantee a causable finding of ineffective counsel. She wanted to fire him. He wanted to withdraw. How can this not scream that she wasn’t being vigorously, properly, and effectively represented? It’s almost like he was her worst enemy.

If you haven’t seen this, you need to read it. I would also make this a primary attachment to the appeal brief evidence appendix.

Click here to read Jodi’s Motion to Change Counsel – (from October 2013)

The surest and rocket–fast way to get remand for a new trial is with the discovery of new evidence. Almost everything, where experts and private investigators and cracker jack attorneys take interest in looking for this new evidence, relates to money and how they will be compensated. No one likes to donate their time and expertise. It usually has a price tag.

But I have a way that one of they KEY pieces of evidence could be discovered and shake the very foundation of this case without the risk investment of ANY time or money, that wouldn’t be repaid at least twenty times over. In fact, it would get world wide attention and instant fame for the individual.

It would assure sweat pouring off the faces of every one of those bastards at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. I’m talking about the gun. If that gun can be recovered, it will be on every major news station in the world.

If the word can be put out to interest somebody who is wealthy, and to incentivize them to offer a substantial enough reward for turning in of that gun, this will get the attention of the media. If this can get publicized to the extent that it becomes widely known to the public–and most important–to the people who may likely HAVE that gun or know where it is, such as gang members or where guns are most often found, this could PRODUCE that gun.

The benefactor could make it a no-questions-asked assurance for whoever turns it in. And that they will be assured of the money reward with no questions asked. We know that gun is somewhere, if not in the Yrkeka area, at least somewhere probably in California. It could be sitting unceremoniously in a pawn shop somewhere if the owner didn’t correlate records with police accounts of stolen guns.

The gun would have to be identifiable as indisputably being the gun stolen from her grandfather to claim the reward. And perhaps her grandfather could provide the way to ascertain that it is the gun he owned. For example, if he recorded the serial number. California has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the U.S. and all handguns in California are supposed to be registered. If not in California’s database–in the Department of Justice Automated Firearms System database.

If the publicity is great enough, everyone who has a .25 acp will be checking their gun’s serial number or description specifics to see if it matches to get the reward. It could become known in all 50 states with the publicity a large enough reward would generate.

However no matter HOW much money is offered in the reward–and it should be substantial to get the attention we need it to have–not a single penny is risked or put out unless the authenticated gun is found and turned in.

When that happens, the benefits that will flow to the investor who put up the reward will be astronomical. Media will be be like a beehive of hornets around this person. They will be sought for paid interviews and recover well beyond their investment with the opportunities that will abound to them. It is a no–lose, huge–win proposition.

Even if–and we know this is not the case–but even if the gun is found and proves to MATCH the bullet used at the crime scene, the story would be equally as huge and the investor couldn’t possibly lose in that eventuality either. If the gun is not found, the investor doesn’t lose a penny. So how could a wise rich savvy individual turn this kind of a golden opportunity down?

When the ballistics tests of this gun reveal that the striations of a bullet fired from this gun do NOT match the striations of the bullet found in Alexander’s jaw, the State’s case for premeditation is exposed as a total fraud. It will instantly assure a new trial, because the guilt phase jury did not vote unanimously for felony murder. The felony murder charge would not have depended on the fact that she stole the gun from her grandfather. Because that charge relied on her taking ALEXANDER’S gun.

But FIVE didn’t vote for felony murder. They voted ONLY for premeditated murder based on the theft of the gun from Yreka. Which was the heart of the prosecution’s case. Martinez stated outright that she stole the gun. Five jurors didn’t buy that story that she shot Travis with his own gun. They convicted her only on the belief she stole her grandfather’s gun, brought it to Mesa with the intention to kill Travis.

If we find that gun, we would have incontrovertible proof she didn’t use, steal, or bring that gun from Yreka. The appeals court would have no choice but to overturn the verdict and remand it for retrial based on new evidence. It would be guaranteed.

The appeals panel couldn’t possibly say that wouldn’t likely have made a difference in achieving a unanimous verdict of premeditation. If it only changed ONE mind out of 5, the jury is hung and the worst possible result would be a lesser conviction.

What a day that would be. For everybody, including the lucky and smart investor who would put up this reward. It would be like a smoking gun that proved that Obama’s birth certificate was a fake.

What we need to do is find a wealthy individual who can recognize this opportunity.

Nurmi and Willmott graduated from a 2 on a five scale in the first trial, to a 3.8 in the second trial. But that wasn’t the money shot. The first trial verdict is the verdict that has to be overturned. And other than the timely filing of motions and objections preserving the record for appeal, that performance was abysmal.

If Nurmi just fluffed off the opportunity to bring back Fonseca and Pseudonym just recently when it would been a lambasting with what they probably found on the hard drive, and then Fonseca would have tore up trainee-doc, I would be up in arms. It would have been the testimony that Martinez was dreading–his worst nightmare. And what the hell happened, I’m just baffled.

If Nurmi didn’t get something that made it worth giving up all that potential testimony, that’s more than enough right there for me to UNQUESTIONABLY and categorically cement the case that he is TOTALLY ineffective counsel. I was looking forward to it more than any testimony in the whole trial. I’m just dumbfounded as to what happened. Why do you let Martinez off the meat hook just when the proof of perjury and Alexander’s cache of vile secrets is about to be revealed? I really want to know that answer.

But right now, we need to take that record–which is the only thing that’s important at this stage–and turn that crapfest of a six month violation of Jodi’s constitutional rights, into a new trial.

Where deja vu all over again will not be so pretty for the Martinez family of criminals, if they even have the balls to retry it. We have to insure that they have to make that choice.

Let’s really rock their world. I say let’s put an APB out on that gun, find it.

And let’s get this party started!

Debra, I hope you end up owning Maricopa County. Sell the M.C.A.O to ISIS. Put those Montgomery and Martinez duo POS carnivores in the back of a C-130 and drop them out over Mosul.

Jade

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

JADE’S ADDITIONAL POSTS IN THIS SERIES:

Corruption, State-Sponsored Murder & Twelve Angry Men
Jodi Arias: Justice Denied
Michael Melendez – Perjury Exposed
The Presumption of Innocence
The Immaculate Deception – Exposed

© 2015: Jade & Jodi Arias Is Innocent .com – All Rights Reserved.
Any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of this document is strictly prohibited.
*** Click the links above to share this page on your favorite social media sites ***
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

If you would like to help Jodi by way of a financial donation to the JAA APPELLATE FUND, click the Team Jodi link below for further details. All donations via Justice4Jodi.com go directly to the fund for assisting with the legal fees associated with appealing Jodi’s wrongful conviction. Justice4Jodi.com is the ONLY website authorized to collect donations.

In addition, please DO NOT, under any circumstances, donate through any other website or Facebook page/group claiming to be “official” and/or acting with Jodi’s approval or authorization. The same applies to any “Jodi Membership Clubs”, groups or fake Trust funds that have been set up. These sites are bogus – as are their intentions – and they should be actively avoided. If you are aware of any such sites, please help Jodi by clicking here and reporting them. Thank you for your ongoing support!

.

.
JADE’S ADDITIONAL POSTS IN THIS SERIES:

Stephens, Sandbagging & The Six Month Crap-Fest
Jodi Arias: Justice Denied
Michael Melendez – Perjury Exposed
The Presumption of Innocence
The Immaculate Deception – Exposed

© 2015: Jade & Jodi Arias Is Innocent .com – All Rights Reserved.
Any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of this document is strictly prohibited.
*** Click the links above to share this page on your favorite social media sites ***
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I’m so over you repugnant Alexander johnny-come-lately post grievers. You’re like paid mourners at a funeral. The only relationship you had with the pedophile pimp of prevarication and inspector of children’s underwear, was a strained one, and you milked every last greenback from every last dimwitted asshole who didn’t know it was an act. I’m loving the fact that only one true hero denied everything you wanted. Suck it. Crawl in your train and head back to where you came from.

This case was and is an enigma wrapped in anomalies, replete with criminal subterfuge by the M.C.A.O Nazis who have distinguished themselves as scum-like vermin.

If only Jodi had insisted on a lawyer being present during questioning, Martinez would be swinging by his scrotal sack right now and wouldn’t have had a chance in hell at proving a case of first degree murder, let alone pre-meditated murder. The biggest obstacle was Jodi’s own words.

She then fell into the netherworld of nightmares by having no ability to acquire a specialist defense attorney. Nurmi was a specialist in criminal aspects of sexual abuse and domestic violence and that’s what he went with. He went with his forte instead of focusing like a laser on the forensics, photographs and the blood that was like a road map of devastation for the prosecution case.

The photographs should have been mocked in front of the jury and the impossibilities pointed out in all the micro analytic detail that was there to be reduced to a level of absurdity. Blood wasn’t where it should be or was where it shouldn’t be. The diversion to domestic violence kept the prosecution’s ability to keep the misdirection going of their midnight manipulations and secreting away of vast and voluminous amounts of exculpatory evidence.

False confession lost all impetus as a real possibility. False confessions result in cases that are overturned almost exclusively when a confession is recanted prior to trial. When the weight of a confession is more significant to a jury than the evidence offered showing the confession was untrue and given for reasons other than guilt, this is when cases are overturned by higher courts.

The finding being that the jury should have considered the testimony and evidence to be more convincing than the confession in the opinion of the appeal court judges. And as such, the confession was either coerced or supported by evidence that the defendant gave truthful testimony on the stand that they did not commit the crime.

In Jodi’s case, she not only didn’t recant the confession, she specifically reinforced the admission of killing Alexander time and time again on the witness stand. She said she remembers dropping the knife in the bathroom because it hit tile. She remembers putting a knife in the dishwasher.

To say she was not there that day falls into the most far-fetched unrealistic hopes as opposed to reality, because there is an independent confirmation that supports it. Alexander was watching the YouTube video of people dancing around with crazy hats on their heads at 4 am when she arrived. She stated this is what he was watching. And this was confirmed by the examination of the hard drive that this video was being watched at that time. She could not have known that unless she saw what he was watching that early morning in his office. So it’s corroborating and validating proof she was there.

And here nobody messed up on the technicalities of the Miranda warning during interrogation. They were also emphatic when she said that she may as well admit to something because it’s what they wanted to hear. And that it seemed fruitless because she was being told repeatedly the case was airtight. But they told her implicitly that is absolutely not what they wanted her to do. It insulates them from any hope of successful claim of false confession. In short there is no confession to throw out. The interrogation sessions were videotaped and they leave no basis to contend a false confession.

These statements are a matter of police and court record and any attempt to discount them will fall on deaf ears with an appeals court. This is why it is so important to find legal grounds where the trial guilt verdict can be set aside and a new trial ordered.

There isn’t a scintilla of doubt in my mind that she feared for her life or was in fear of great bodily injury that day during the moments that preceded the stabbing–both of which allow for defending herself. I’m extremely confident that everything happened as she described it up until the time of the gunshot. After that, there is no doubt in my mind that Alexander came unhinged and at no time was he incapacitated by the small projectile that deflected from his skull under the skin, went through the right sinus, through the vertical nose plate, through the left sinus and eventually came to lodge in his cheek.

And what it was that actually happened in those minutes, hours or days after that, contravenes everything the prosecution glued and patched together. It defies time, space and strength reality continuums. Physics is turned on its head, and even gravity effects that appear on photos requires belief in the paranormal to accept it. Case problematics are truly best exemplified by the oft-used puzzle piece analogies. It’s as if we have extra pieces from another puzzle that obviously don’t fit the puzzle we have. And pieces from the puzzle we have that we need explanation for, are missing.

* We have weight differences of 85 pounds or more,

* We have a muscled martial arts expert who isn’t able to strike a single blow,

* We have time spans that are preposterous to accomplish what is asserted was done,

* We have a hand print on a wall in an open corridor but not a smidge of blood on pure white tile or glass door where moving and dragging and shifting and maneuvering should have resulted in all sorts of tell-tale blood evidence of some kind from hands, feet or clothes swiping against it.

Why would she specifically be obsessed to wash blood off that area making it absolutely pristine when his blood is absolutely everywhere else in that bathroom that she doesn’t clean and doesn’t care about? Why would the blood on the glass door of the shower be more important to clean than the blood in and on the sink just for one example? Even turning on the shower wouldn’t have removed every trace of blood on all the surfaces.

How would the shower remove blood on the outside of the aluminum frame enclosure where she would have almost certainly had to place her hand for leverage or in the struggle, to get him in the shower? It can’t be argued without claiming nonsensical contortions of reality.

We have a body that has no entomological evidence when it should have been a Disneyland for flies, larvae, and bugs after five days.

More brain twizzlers: these are more things that leave me puzzled

With blood on the tile, on the walls, on the blinds, on the toilet, on the sink, on the carpet… how is it that not a SINGLE drop of blood ended up on this big 7 foot long, 5 foot wide, humongous pure white thing? Blood is evident only inches away and even on the floor mat.

Click to view full size image in a new window

What in the world is with this box? This could not result with water from a glass, this had to be caused by a LOT of water. It had to be SITTING in water–at least a half inch on the floor for it to have wicked up this far and still have the strong reddish coloration that high up on the box. It wasn’t splashed on the box, it soaked up from the bottom. This is clear from the jaggedy line.

It’s extremely puzzling because with the amount of water it would take to soak up to that level on the box, it should surely also have diluted the big puddles of blood in front of the doorway and spread them out a lot more also. Or made the concentrations smaller in size if the box was in the closet and that much water contacted it there. How could these big puddles ON TILE not have been washed away if the blood was fresh, and that much water washed over it? How could it affect the box and not the blood on the floor?

Could this box have been somewhere else and then moved into the closet?

Click to view full size image in a new window

And what could have possibly happened to cause the huge amount of blood in these pools–the one in front of the closet and the one pictured below. What stab wound would have caused what looks to me to be like even MORE blood than where his throat was to have been cut?

Certainly the slicing of the throat would cause the greatest quantity of blood loss and the quickest time. Yet these large pools of blood seem to be at LEAST equally as large or larger. And he had to be stationary here when this blood was lost. There is no movement indicated when this blood was deposited. Blood trails do not emanate away from the main concentration.

Is it remotely possible that his throat wound was in fact carried out in front of the closet door and that it was blood from the bullet wound and possibly other gashes already on his head that we see on the carpet? If he was laying face down on the carpet, the blood is more to the right side of the hallway than it is to the left looking at it from his perspective. And it would be comporting with the downward blood smear on the wall where Martinez said he fell face down. The ramifications of that would turn the present assumptions of this case inside out. Major major blood had to come from some part of his body to make this large blood pool. Nothing Martinez said accounts for it.

Click to view full size image in a new window

Another brain twizzler:

Did she strategize and brainstorm this murder to such a finite degree that she would have thought to have her shoes somewhere in the bathroom or clean socks prior to starting taking pictures of him in the shower? The most likely place she would have had her shoes is somewhere in the bedroom. Probably near or around the bed. We know that Martinez INSISTS she was wearing socks in the gotcha photo.

Now certainly after these two photos–avariciously acclaimed as the smoking guns–there has to be–and there is–blood everywhere in the bathroom on the floor. And most importantly we know it is a small size foot SOCK print in the carpet where all the apparent stomping around was taking place and where a good amount of water was alleged to have been used. Therefore blood or blood/water mixture would have had to be on the bottom of her socks. Any contact of her foot with the carpet would have instantly left some reddish coloration that would have stained it.

So unless she had her shoes in the bathroom, how would she get out to get her shoes or new socks without leaving SOME transfer footprint on the bedroom carpet? The closet was also pure white carpet, she couldn’t possibly step in there NOWHERE without leaving footprint transfer. Does it seem likely she would have thought so far in advance that she would have an extra pair of shoes or socks somewhere around the shower? That’s nuts. Plus I’ve also shown that it appears there are other footprints in the carpet at the end of the hall that are not those of a small foot.

Another one that doesn’t add up:

Jodi testified that she saw that she had blood on her hands when she stopped near the Hoover damn. Said she washed her hands with bottled water from the trunk. How could she have blood on her hands and not leave some evidence of blood somewhere on her way out? The most likely place would be the door knob. Even if she left through the garage, she would still have to touch a door knob. But there is another thing that would have almost certainly had blood–the doggie gate.

Martinez said she cleaned up and that’s why there was no blood. But if she had blood on her hands–which she clearly stated she did–it gives just that much more credence to her not knowing what happened, which is what she also testified to. And it was Jodi who said if she would ever premeditate a murder, she would obviously use gloves. You would have to be an imbecile not to. Anybody who would say otherwise would have to be an imbecile to say they wouldn’t. This leaves the only logical question; why would Jodi say she had blood on her hands if her testimony wasn’t truthful?

I don’t believe she has or had any mental illness period. I believe that whatever happened OUT OF FEAR, shut down her cognitive functions. It is after–traumatic stress shutdown, that took her mind to a safe place. Jodi didn’t have a whisp of violence in her body and not in a billion years did she plan to travel to Mesa to kill Alexander. She didn’t plan anything except an interim stopover to do what they had done so many times before on her way to see the guy who was her new interest and the one phasing Alexander out.

It’s actions of Alexander’s own choosing that put him in that body bag. With so many dilemmas that any reasonable person should have trouble answering, this does not fit to be all wrapped up neatly and solved with answers that stand up to real scrutiny. They fail miserably and had it not been for, originally twelve fuckheads, and now twenty three, who don’t have the intelligence to predict the weather yesterday, we would have had at the very MAXIMUM, a verdict of 2nd degree murder.

If she had only requested a lawyer in the early stages as she was being interrogated, it would have melted any hopes of first degree premeditated murder or even first degree murder like wet cotton candy. It shows the provenance of the first law of procedure if you are ever accused of ANY crime–do not say a WORD to the police without having a lawyer present. Don’t even wait for the Miranda warning, just state that you are not guilty of any crime and that you don’t wish to speak without an attorney present. State also that you would like this statement recorded that you have told the officer that you don’t wish to speak.

Even in what you think are confidential conversations with others at a police station conference room or examination room, these conversations are also able to be used in evidence against you and are likely audio or video monitored. Higher courts have held that you have no reasonable expectation of privacy once in the custody of police, except with your attorney.

Jodi is where she is because she was naive and trusting, just as she had been in all the relationships. Listening to her pre-trial interrogations shows the epitome amalgam of the California “Valley Girl” with the “I’m like.. and “he’s like” and then “I’m like.” It was only missing the verbal essentials “totally” and “rad.” It actually made me cringe listening to her at points at the age she was at the time, and hearing this “teen age” immaturity so associated with the stereotype. Only Jodi wasn’t the affluent typical version, she was a poor version of the stereotype who had to scrape together her few dollars however she could, through waitressing. And then shared much of that either loaning it or pitching in for somebody else’s slacker shortcomings.

All the sharks who spotted this combination of Chrissy Snow similarities, inferiority complex, self deprecation and willingness to please, took advantage of it and used her and controlled her. It was who she was–the innocent little Bambi bouncing around in the grass. It wasn’t rooted in any violence or propensity for any violence. It was a little girl who liked the affirmation of acceptance from someone she thought was cute, even though she was being played much or most of the time. This girl was no more violent than Mother Theresa.

Alexander is the one who had the propensity for violence and was the perfect storm prelude to a ticking time bomb. What happened that day, I agree one thousand percent with Dr. Geffner’s conclusion of PTSD. Having the graphic reality confront her of what adrenaline caused her to go into a self-protect mode to survive, was so contrary to everything she could envision, that the mind would not consciously perceive it. It was already reinforced with earlier traumatic incidents of having a knife to her throat, being choked by a previous boyfriend and having been made unconscious by the exploding temper of the very individual whose last words she remembers saying “kill you bitch.” Now that bastard won’t be choking nobody no more.

In one of the greatest and sweetest of all possible ironies, you don’t get to kill her either.

If it wasn’t for the temporary ordeal Jodi would have had to go through in solitary lock-up and the fact that I salivated to see the Alexander’s get their payback with a hung jury, a death sentence would have been even better.

The insistence that those bullshit photos document the incredibly short time that Jodi is alleged to have completed this killing, would have been the very thing that guaranteed that the Supreme Court would have justified a finding to void the guilty verdict and remand it for retrial. It wouldn’t even have gotten into the willful withholding of evidence and Brady and Giglio transgressions –which are voluminous, prolific and unabated–because they would not have been relevant. The case would have turned strictly on the aggravating factor of cruelty.

The Supreme Court is immune to what the ignorant public thinks is shocking and they are aware of crimes that are multitudes more brutal and sadistic which truly warrant the cruelty aggravator. In this case, as they have ruled in others, that would have sounded even worse to the water cooler crowd, they reversed the verdict because of the killing being done so quickly, it did not subject the victim to a period of suffering. They considered it only “escalating” the killing or called it “efficient,” so suffering for the victim was minimal.

Even the dipshit ME here, said Alexander would have been unconscious within a minute or so. You can’t suffer if you’re unconscious. There has to be a conscious suffering and awareness of the killers intentions that delays the certain death perception. Here, I’m confident, it would have been the very thing they concocted to kill her, that would have voided the cruelty aggravator and required a new trial.

Did you notice how that pompous POS did the theatrics at the closing rebuttal where he wanted to have complete silence for two minutes? This was already his major concern and he was doing damage control. What he didn’t announce–and the court would have seized on–is that it was nowhere even near two minutes. It was 62 seconds! And that included the time it would have taken to turn him around at the end of the hallway and drag him half way back down the hall before the last picture was taken in the corridor. So Alexander was already (according to him and his conspirator ME) long dead already from the throat slice.

So the actual time of suffering would have been pro-rated and by extrapolation more like 30 seconds before he was unconscious. Martinez was trying to preempt the Supremes from kicking the case back with his lame dramatics, for that very reason. He knew it was hanging by a thread. As it was, they were already rejected for 5 of the 6 aggravators. And within the cruelty aggravator, there are 3 parts–heinous, cruel and depraved. So out of 3 parts, the judge only allowed one. In other words, they had already failed on eight of the nine special circumstances that can raise a murder case status to be tried as a death penalty case. And it would have been a monster kick in the nuts when the AZ Supreme Court reversed it, which I’m sure they would have. No aggravator–no death penalty. The case would have had to be retried, or they could go pound sand–their choice.

But as it was, juror 17, you’re the two X chromosome exemplar of Henry Fonda in Twelve Angry Men and one day you will be righteously vindicated. If anything happens to this woman, if you think this trial cost money, wait ’til Montgomery the mob boss, gets done gagging on the numbers of the size of that lawsuit that will be slapped against Maricopa County. He better have a lot of inside friends at Fort Knox.

This story of corruption and state-sponsored murder is not over… and when it is, juror 17, you will be the one holding your head high.

I only hope we can honor you at the celebration of Jodi’s coming out party and Martinez, Horn, Flores and the rest of the cast of the other motherfuckers going away party. Courtesy of the AZ Supreme Court.

Hughes, I got real real special wishes for you.

And as for you Alexanders …….. (click here)

Jade

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

JADE’S ADDITIONAL POSTS IN THIS SERIES:

Stephens, Sandbagging & The Six Month Crap-Fest
Jodi Arias: Justice Denied
Michael Melendez – Perjury Exposed
The Presumption of Innocence
The Immaculate Deception – Exposed

© 2015: Jade & Jodi Arias Is Innocent .com – All Rights Reserved.
Any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of this document is strictly prohibited.
*** Click the links above to share this page on your favorite social media sites ***
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

If you would like to help Jodi by way of a financial donation to the JAA APPELLATE FUND, click the Team Jodi link below for further details. All donations via Justice4Jodi.com go directly to the fund for assisting with the legal fees associated with appealing Jodi’s wrongful conviction. Justice4Jodi.com is the ONLY website authorized to collect donations.

In addition, please DO NOT, under any circumstances, donate through any other website or Facebook page/group claiming to be “official” and/or acting with Jodi’s approval or authorization. The same applies to any “Jodi Membership Clubs”, groups or fake Trust funds that have been set up. These sites are bogus – as are their intentions – and they should be actively avoided. If you are aware of any such sites, please help Jodi by clicking here and reporting them. Thank you for your ongoing support!

.