site
stats

Martinez Sacked

*** CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL STORY @ FOX 10 PHOENIX ***

Following the investigation of countless allegations of sexual harassment in 2017 — including the interviewing of 30 employees — the wheels on the bus have finally come off for the pedo-huggers favorite prosecutor.

Here’s the story from Fox 10 Phoenix, Feb 14th:

Juan Martinez, prosecutor noted for role in Jodi Arias trial, has been fired.

PHOENIX – FOX 10 has learned that Juan Martinez, a prosecutor with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office who gained national notoriety after getting a guilty verdict in the Jodi Arias trial, has been dismissed from his position.

10-28 retrial - more non-sensical BS from kermit

In early February, officials with MCAO say Martinez was placed on paid administrative leave.

At the time, officials did not provide any further information surrounding the decision, citing a personnel matter and only saying Martinez was placed on leave, on February 7.

On Friday, FOX 10 obtained documents surrounding the dismissal, which shed new light on what happened. On the same day Martinez was placed on paid administrative leave, county officials sent to Martinez, via hand delivery, a Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The letter detailed a number of alleged violations of the Maricopa County Employee Merit System Resolution, including discourteous treatment of the public or fellow employees, violation of county or departmental policies or procedures in regards to workplace professionalism and prohibition against discrimination, harassment and retaliation, and a Code of Ethics violation.

In the letter, county officials say Martinez’s conduct has created an environment at the county attorney’s office that is now “impossible to manage effectively.”

“For example, we must work to keep you away from those you victimized,” read the letter. “This fact makes it difficult to assign you to bureaus and even your physical location within the building presents challenges. Even if we could isolate you from your victims based on job assignment and work location, it is not possible to prevent contact with your victims.”

*** CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL STORY @ FOX 10 PHOENIX ***

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

UPDATE: The JAA Appellate Fund total currently stands at $99,192.34 — so let’s be sure to keep the momentum rolling so the fund total can push on towards the ultimate target of $250,000. That in turn will help towards covering all the legal fees associated with appealing Jodi’s wrongful conviction.

All donations via Justice4Jodi.com go directly to the fund. It is also the ONLY website authorized to collect donations.

In addition, please DO NOT, under any circumstances, donate through any other website or Facebook page/group claiming to be “official” and/or acting with Jodi’s approval or authorization. The same applies to any “Jodi Membership Clubs”, groups or fake Trust funds that have been set up. These sites are bogus – they continue to steal money from Jodi’s future – and they should be actively avoided. If you are aware of any such sites, please help Jodi by clicking here and reporting them.

Remember… each day that passes takes us one day closer to Jodi’s release date.

we are team jodi - and we will be victorious

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

As always, be sure to leave your thoughts & comments below…

SJ
Team Jodi #WINNING <<<

Click the banner below to read Jade’s post – “Justice Denied: Why The Jurors Got It Wrong & How The Facts Decimate The State’s Case Against Jodi Arias.”:

Read - Justice Denied - Why The Jurors Got It Wrong & How The Facts Decimate The State's Case Against Jodi Arias

36 Comments

  1. Just got the news last night pop up on mobile phone news .That Martinez was fired Charleston sc eastern time 2100 hrs.Hope to here about her appeal soon like to see her go home. Looked like ransacked case of different news and media displaying in uneasy situations of privacy and force out look on jury’s decision. To make money.

  2. Hey I heard Jodi had a tablet. She bought on the 9th. From the store in perryville.Can some dial up here out going response on the event to get a heads. Here is a link from YouTube talking about her new toy .The state of Arizona will let you own.https://youtu.be/wKAyufFXwZo

  3. 48 hours, sorry:

    Just FYI gals and boys, Jodi can receive email/has her tablet now. I’m not actually sure if it really works already (delivery time up to 48 hours because of content monitoring by CO’s I guess) but the functionality is unlocked for her on Jpay now.

  4. This was the most wonderful news! Martinez Fired! Thank you to God above! Hoping and praying this will HELP Jodi in her fight for FREEDOM! FREE JODI AZ!

  5. Now that Jodi Arias’ conviction has been affirmed, what is going to happen to the remaining $100,000 raised for her appeal? How has the money been spent? Please post a ledger of how the money has been spent thus far.

    • Hi Brett,

      there’s one more state financed appeal to come.
      This next step is called “post-conviction relief” where new evidence and possibly ineffective assistance of counsel will/could be discussed. Another 3rd point would be when the court itself changes its opinion about legal matters in this case.

      So long and stay healthy all

      Frank

      (The CoA report is an illogical/incoherent piece of bull crap btw. Reads like satire and is a massive insult to intelligence and decency/logic – just wow, that they’re not ashamed of themselves.)

    • The appeal to the Court of Appeals was paid for by the state, as will be another stage, the post-conviction relief petition. After that, Jodi will have to hire a private appellate lawyer to handle her further appeals in the state and federal system. That is where the appellate fund will go, and a substantial amount still needs to be raised.

    • Brett, I don’t have a ledger but the money raised for her appeal has nothing to do with this appeal (which is automatically paid for by the State of Arizona) but is for the attorney she will need to hire when she appeals to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (which comes after PCR – post-conviction relief – which I know very little about at this point). Some money was spent going after Martinez and Nurmi, part of the longer-term strategy in her final appeal.

  6. The following is quoted from someone who understands the legal system well and has read all 29 pages of the decision:

    “Just crazy. They are basically saying she didn’t get a fair trial but that doesn’t matter because she would have been found guilty even if she had got a fair trial. Makes no sense.”

    • Of the 29 pages comprising the Court of Appeals decision, 17 are fully devoted to describing and admonishing the egregious and disgusting behavior of the prosecutor. Yet they conclude that none of that affected the outcome. SMH

  7. Hey everyone, I hope all of you still have some six-packs Corona Extra at home! 🙂

    Here, in case you guys didn’t but want to read this crap from the CoA.
    It’s a disgrace for themselves and for the justice system as a whole. An insult to intelligence and decency. Like they didn’t even bother for a second to think independently and critically about the case and the state’s fabricated version of it (which of course has absolutely “nothing” to do with hiding and destroying evidence, harassing witnesses and 1001 other misconduct actions outside and inside the court room by Gollum’s Ugly Little Brother), or they are simply intellectually not able to.

    The public doesn’t deserve such blatant shallow and probably biased idiots in such a position in an appeal court. Neither does Jodi or any other defendant of course.

    But that’s for sure no big deal in corrupt to the core AZ, any idiot gets any job and keeps it for decades, may it be a prosecutor, the prosecutor’s boss or an appeal judge…
    This whole thing is so embarrassing, PACKED with obvious shallow cluelessness caused by lack of any critical and logical thinking abilities, with ignorance, lies, inaccuracies, half-truths, pure baseless assumptions and whatnot. Disgusting.
    These judges are shallow state of the art morons or intentionally fabricating this “decision” (and pitifully failing to do that in a justifiable/convincing manner) while knowing it has no foundation/justification in law/reality whatsoever and is just a pile of horse shit, but is instead purely based on grounds of a political decision that might even have been rendered already before the “deliberation” even started.

    I’m sorry for Jodi and any other défendent who is handed over to and dependant on such shallow and depraved assholes.

    With disgust

    So long

    Frank

    https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A24a4606b-b51b-4e5e-8ea0-57001b28813b

    https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A9c9bd28d-8f3a-41d0-a802-18cd673c5a4b

  8. What with self-isolation and my lack of a printer, I haven’t yet read the CoA’s opinion. But from glancing at a few selections of it, two things strike me.

    (1) Convinced by Jodi’s lawyers’ exhaustive documentation of Martinez’s misconduct at trial, the CoA panel does a superb job of describing its scope and depth. Their unequivocal and eloquent denunciation of his conduct, which was “pervasive” and “saturated” the trial, may be a powerful hook to get Jodi’s case into the federal system. In any event, Martinez is done as an Arizona prosecutor. His firing from Maricopa County will certainly stand, and he is likely to be disbarred.

    (2) There is a big hole in the CoA’s argument that the admission of the cop’s gun evidence, though hearsay, was harmless error because merely cumulative. Namely, that the grandparents reported not just a stolen gun, but a stolen .25-caliber gun, was very important to the strength of this fact as evidence of premeditation, and the caliber came in only through the cop’s testimony. A reasonable juror might well have found the gun-burglary evidence unconvincing without it, but convincing with it. Moreover, since this is the first item on the CoA’s (otherwise wholly unconvincing) list of proofs of premeditation, if the jury was not entitled to hear it the CoA’s affirmation in the face of pervasive misconduct is seriously weakened.

    All in all, at first glance this opinion looks way more helpful to Jodi’s cause than I was expecting. It gives her current and future lawyers a lot to work with in the rest of the appeals

  9. In case you had any doubts about Nurmi’s rotten moral character, here he is openly rejoicing in the affirmance of his own client’s conviction (which he said in his book he never even tried to prevent), in the process outright lying about Jodi’s admitting guilt of first-degree murder. Of course she never admitted anything of the sort, as he well knows.

    https://www.abc15.com/news/state/arizona-court-of-appeals-upholds-jodi-arias-murder-conviction?fbclid=IwAR3lZl7bN_18UvRwLVW23Zu02gkv6SkywDzzZ2TZp5uA7Zv93Y1RIucTVCo

    • Hoy Alan,

      I’m pretty sure this annoying slow – brainer/”thinker”/speaker, who allows you to go for a walk with the dog while he tries and fails to formulate a coherent sentence, refers to the moment where Jodi, minutes prior to sentencing by Sherry “Overstrained Housewife” Stephens, says that she “now remembers the moment she slit his throat while he was still alive and still attacking her” (somegthg to that effect), either because he’s really too braindead to get it or he intentionally malicious misinterprets that statement incorrectly as an admission of intentional homicide while stupidly ignoring the obvious “still attacking” bit and rightfully hopes the dumfounded hater mob he tries to please with all this conman act he performs since years are too much of ambulatory head wounds to realize that and chant “burn that bitch” like demented pré Neanderthalers.

      While her intent was of course only to portray the horror of the moment and how it was her last possible exit/measure to end this attack by her vicious and depraved psychopath abuser. and to survive all this.
      If you own at least some empathy and decency you cannot prevent yourself from interpreting it that way. Of course neither Nurmi, nor the vicious and primitive fork – swinging hater mob or the likewise “equipped” “victims” family own any of that.

      Hang loose

      Frank

  10. Aloha everyone,

    very good article from Michael Kiefer. It’s rare, actually totally UNIQUE to read/see something remotly intelligent/educated/objective about this case.
    My only objection would be about the notion to have “no doubt” about a fit of rage – that implies some certainty and that isn’t intellectually honest and accurate since nobody can know that. Certainly crime of passion/rage OR self defense are possible and most importantly not disproven, while the absurdities that even these outstanding retarded/clueless/shallow/ignorant appeal judges cite to prove premeditation are an insult to intelligence.

    Hang loose

    Frank

    https://www.azmirror.com/2020/03/27/the-state-of-arizona-v-jodi-arias-and-juan-martinez/

  11. Now it is serious! The state appeals are now running their course. Hopefully, we can get together and get these funds together so Jodi can get an attorney worth the money to help her.

Comments are closed.

Previous Story

Martinez put on administrative leave following investigation

Next Story

The State v. Jodi Arias… and Juan Martinez

Latest from Latest News

Fine Feral Felines

Fine Feral Felines (Foreword by Jodi Arias) Recently, I read what was probably the most adorable