Check out this interesting post, and leave your comments below…
SJ
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A new year and it begins with a murder trial! On June 4, 2008, Travis Alexander was found dead in his Mesa, Arizona home and the State alleges that Jodi Ann Arias was the killer. The trial has indeed captivated the public with the elements of an Oscar-nominated blockbuster film-love, lies, and murder. And like most publicized murder trials, the alleged killer has already been handed a guilty verdict from the public opinion of her peers. But, unlike most publicized murder trials, the killer has already admitted culpability for the crime. Thus, the killing of Travis Alexander is not about proving who did it, but rather proving whether or not Jodi Ann Arias deserves the death penalty as her punishment.
As a public defender and contrary to popular belief, I believe that the testimony of the Medical Examiner spared Miss Arias from the death penalty and may have even set the stage for the premeditation murder charges to be dismissed. Fortunately for Miss Arias, she was not indicted for lesser charges by the State’s prosecution such as involuntary manslaughter or assault with a deadly weapon.
Also, I find it perplexing that the State went so far as to indict her for burglary. I failed to see how the prosecution’s testimony proves burglary. Showing nude photos of Miss Arias lying naked in the victim’s bed is not exactly how I would define the statute of burglary. If that is the standards of an Arizona burglary then chain me to the wall! And please do not even think for one second that the burglary charges are for supposedly stealing the .25 caliber gun from her grandparent’s home in Yreka! The State of Arizona would not charge her for a crime which was committed in California; Yreka is well outside the jurisdiction of Arizona. But alas, I’ve digressed here.
Last week, we heard the testimony from the County’s Medical Examiner, Doctor Kevin Horn who believes Travis Alexander was stabbed to death first and then shot with a .25 caliber gun. Generally speaking, it seems that the consensus among the public is that the sequence of weapon use is irrelevant. Oh, but I beg to differ! It is very much relevant to the case, especially now that Doctor Horn’s testimony contradicts the charges of murder with premeditation. I find it rather appalling that Miss Arias’ defense team has not been quick to capitalize on this seemingly minor quandary.
Let me explain…
Since Doctor Kevin Horn has testified that Travis Alexander was stabbed first and shot later then his expert testimony alone is sufficient to disprove the premeditation charges!
See testimony excerpt below on sequencing:
[hdplay id=22 width=500 height=300]
Why?
Because the prosecution has argued that Miss Arias stole a .25 caliber gun from her grandparent’s residence in Yreka then drove 15-whatever hours to Travis Alexander’s residence with said gun and the whole while she is supposedly ‘premeditating’ the murder. (Oh, and let us not forget that somewhere in the middle of all this, there were the naughty photos taken in the bedroom and clear implications of sex between Miss Arias and Travis Alexander; hardly implying she was ‘premeditating’ her intent of murdering him!)
But, there is one other minor problem here…
Why did she then stab Travis Alexander first (according to Doctor Horn’s testimony) instead of using the .25 caliber gun she allegedly stole solely for the intention of murdering Travis Alexander???
Thus, in this particular case, for the ‘premeditation’ component of the murder to truly exist, Miss Arias would have had to use the .25 caliber gun first to kill Travis Alexander which would have then demonstrated the possibility of ‘premeditation.’ Miss Arias’ defense team should have been on top of this and motioned the court for a dismissal with prejudice since the prosecution failed to deliver strong enough evidence to support the charges of a premeditated murder.
Under A.R.S. section 13-1105(A)(1), the State of Arizona defines ‘premeditation’ as:
“Premeditation” means that the defendant acts with either the intention or the knowledge that he will kill another human being, when such intention or knowledge precedes the killing by any length of time to permit reflection. Proof of actual reflection is not required, but an act is not done with premeditation if it is the instant effect of a sudden quarrel or heat of passion.
The prosecution has rested the premeditation aspect of the charges purely on circumstantial evidence. But, the question still remains: Did Miss Arias steal the .25 caliber gun from her grandparent’s residence with the intention of using it to kill Travis Alexander? Juan Martinez has only implied, but not proven she did in fact steal the handgun. Therefore, we have the existence of reasonable doubt. If Miss Arias’ intentions were to kill Travis Alexander then she would have acted upon her intentions by first using the .25 caliber gun she allegedly stole.
If I were her attorney, I would recall Dr. Horn to the stand and then drive this point home to the jury by using the doctor’s own testimony against the prosecution’s case of premeditated murder. Then I would recall the police officer who responded to the robbery of the Yreka residence and have him testify that no knives were reported stolen. That is if I couldn’t get the entire case dismissed with prejudice beforehand.
If the court denies the motion to dismiss the charges with prejudice then it leaves the defense team no other choice but to disprove the Medical Examiner’s theory regarding the sequence of weapon use. Let me articulate. For Self Defense to reasonably occur (as the defense is asserting) then it’s absolutely imperative that the gun was discharged first. Then it will be much easier for the defense team to assert Miss Arias’ claim of self-defense.
It is now conceivable that Travis Alexander remained a threat to her even after being shot in the face with a very weak caliber handgun. On the other hand, I would have a very difficult time believing he was still at large after Miss Arias supposedly slashed his throat. Shooting him in the face after slashing his throat was really just adding insult to injury… no other way of putting it. It would be in the best interest of the defense to subpoena an expert gunsmith to the witness stand so the jury can actually hear from said expert the minimal effects caused by a .25 caliber handgun; it has the power equivalent to a Super Soaker squirt gun.
Juan Martinez blew it big time when it was revealed through the testimony of one of his expert witnesses that Travis Alexander was stabbed to death first and then shot with a .25 caliber gun. I just hope that her defense team seizes the opportunity. They could really turn the tides of her trial and quite possibly receive a much more favorable verdict from the jury, such as an acquittal.
-Eric Falk, JD
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .








