Jodi Arias Trial – Day 47

in Latest News by



Today’s events could be very interesting to say the least… and with everything that’s happened so far, we certainly can’t rule anything out.

The trial is scheduled to start @ 9:30 am without the jury being present – and as far as I know it’ll be covered on the live video feed.

Grace Wong (HLN) is down to testify @ 11 am. That’ll be a continuation of the evidentiary hearing related to prosecutorial misconduct (and possibly some other matters). The initial hearing featured Jinkasaurus from HLN back on March 28th.

After the noon recess – which is the only part of the trial that’s always on time – the jury are scheduled to return @ 1.30 pm.

Leave your comments below on trial day 47…

Team Jodi


  1. That Erin Murray chick that started the whole thing against Alyce on should be ashamed of herself!!! I think she should get a life! I am a wife and a stay at home mom and would like to tell her to STFU and go in the kitchen and make me a sandwich, beeotch!

    Ahh… that’s better!

    • How about Mallory Harvey? She snuck a pic of the defense in a restaurant, video taped it, and sent it to Nancy Grace who thanked her for it. I bashed the shit out of Mallory on Facebook. Her reply to me was i didn’t stalk AL and that she didn’t think sending that video out would cause a stir. What a liar.. I jumped on her on Facebook and she never came back to face me..

      I researched Mallory and found her on Twitter and Facebook and she thinks sending that video out was a big funny joke but yet she didn’t think it would cause a stir.. I bashed the hell out of her on Facebook.. She has that video on her Facebook page.. She should have been fined for that and her camera phone smashed right in front of her.. Fucking troll

      • Didn’t know about her, John. She sounds like a real gem too! Maybe they can hook up and be BFFs! It saddens me that there are such hateful women that take time out of their life to stalk or try to ruin Alyce bcuz they hate Jodi so much. It shows you how rational these people are! Did Dr. Henry Lee get all the hate for testifying for OJ? Nope, but according to Jose Baez’s book, he was given peer pressure from other professionals and law enforcement enough to drop out of Casey’s case! Why don’t people see that EVERYONE is entitled to a fair trial and defense? If these people are guilty, don’t these haters have faith that the evidence will prevail?

  2. Good morning Trinity, we are tied at 3rd, but who really cares right?
    It’s all about Wong today and the trial that makes you wanna reach
    out for your Xanax and scream “What kind of Fuckery Bermuda Triangle
    have we all been sucked into???!!!”

  3. Man, I should of waited to post on this page, but if you want a good laugh before the trail starts,go back and check out my post on the prvious page. We all have to laugh once in a while, Plus this suspense is driving me nuts.

      • This is the first case I follow on line, I just wish I could of followed the Casey Anthony case. My friend and some family told me I was wrong about her being found innocent before the trail was done. I wish I would of had a support site like this I could go to. I didn’t have internet service at the time. Thanks again to everybody that makes this site possible.

  4. Goodmoring friends, I took yesterday off, I needed to get away from this crazyness, but im ready for today. GOOOOO TEEEEEEEAAAAM JODIIIIIII ★

  5. Oh, I meant to ask, dies anyone know what they’ll be talking about from 9:30 -11 (before Mrs Wrong), is supposed to take the stand?????

    I REALLLLYYYY really hope, im WISHONG (I mean WISHING), that mrs Wong DOES testify that she DID SEE some of the jurors standing around. And if that’s the case, then THEY have indeed lied when the judge asked if they’ve seen what was going on…….

  6. Okay………….. are we ready for another day of unrelenting bullshit and judicial jokery?

    I am! I have my migraine and my upset stomach, and I am ready!!

    Justice for Jodi!!!

    • Maybe we aren’t going to see the morning part as the seal is still up… This joke mockery system never starts on time……….

      I also have a upset stomach, and had a mirgraine las night stressing over this trial.

  7. Anythings possible at this point…This trial is spiraling out of control.

    And Juan asking if Alyce interviewed Travis, I thought HNL was going to have their ‘psychic’ friend of Travis say she telepathically talked to him from beyond the grave,,,,

  8. HI! I was gone all weekend and just got caught-up with the postings. I enjoyed the 12 News clip regarding the coverage of Juan. Can you say CYA? I wonder if the County Prosecutor’s office made a little phone call to 12 news…hmmmmm? The Prosecutor’s office probably doesn’t have much sway with HLN, but they could sure say something to their local news affiliate.
    As for AL being harrassed – – disgusting. What do you do? In this digital “Anonymous ” age people can post what they want with no consequences. Also, the free speech arguement, which we practice freely on this site! HOORAH! Although, the folks on Facebook posting, I think you can figure out who they are pretty easy and law enforcement could pay them a visit if they are making overtly dangerous threats. ‘
    Thats my thoughts for now! Thanks gang!

    • I was gone all weekend too.

      Hopefully there will be consequences for Juan, HLN, internet bullies, et al, because there’s sure as shit consequences for the rest of us in our ability to get a fair trial.

      I read somewhere that the internet has a lot less anonymity than people think, and that as technology develops it will be the least anonymous place to be. If that’s the case, electronic lynch mobs won’t be emboldened by being nameless, faceless bullies tainting our trials.

  9. I just amazes me to no end why an inexperienced judge on DP cases was given this case to oversee. You’d have thought given the publicity, a more experienced judge would have been given the case.

    It wouldn’t be the mess it is now.

    I say do a Kevorkian on the case and get it over with.

  10. WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Beth Karas is here in a blue dress. She just asked Grace to step outside. Juan has a purple tie with green stripes fyi. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    All of the lights are dimmed by Valerie, it’s like a movie theater as she tests out the lighting. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Spectators are not in here yet. Juan and Flores are at their desk. Nurmi is reclining. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Travis’ family is seated in the front row as usual. Not much going on in here at the moment. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    The screen is setup on an angle where only the judge can see it right now. Lonnie is still tinkering with his laptop. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Judge asks Nurmi how long this part of the hearing will take. He says half hour to an hour. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Lonnie is struggling to setup the pull down screen at the moment. Nurmi is lurching around. We are waiting patiently as usual. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Attorneys are out of sidebar. Grace is asked to bring her laptop outside the courtroom. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    When we begin you can watch live here: … We have a link on there for mobile stream as well. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Live stream won’t start until the hearing begins. State seal still shows. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Judge Stephens motions with her hand for Juan to come up front and join the sidebar. The sizzle noise is playing. #JodiArias

    WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial

    Nurmi came in with a presentation screen. I think Lonnie Dworkin is here, looks like him at least. #JodiArias

  11. Well, depending on Juan’s reaction to Nurmi’s questions to Ms. Wong, we will know if there is anything damaging or not!

    • Maybe he tampered w/photos when enhancing them???? Not a correct representation?? Unless this is a defense witness? Not sure who this guy is

  12. Give me a break…Sister crying (I wonder if she had a switch)…like she hasn’t seen that photo of TA a thousand times already…

    • The haters are helping Jodi so much. Imagine if there WAS someone in his “eye”. Also by them admiring Martinez, photos, autographs, etc imagine if a mistrial WAS called because of that. They are so helpful those haters!!

  13. Auughhh! All these updates are killing me. I can’t watch for another 15 minutes. I am so nervous. When I heard about the picture – if the defense is bring it in, it has to be good for them right?

    • And HLN was panning in on her earlier and I wouldn’t put it past good ole’ Nancy Graceless to have it enlarged and read what she’s writing…it’ll be her BOMBSHELL TONIGHT that she’s always harping about, which we all know is her gimmick because there’s never been no stupid bombshell.

  14. Is the sister crying because she’s right behind Jodi? Is she crying because this is going to kill their case? WHAT?! Did they just move Jodi because they couldn’t stand her next to them??

    • Not that I can tell.

      I mean, I do sort of understand where they are coming from. We all believe Jodi is innocent, we have no issues with her.

      Travis’s family thinks she is guilty and the reason why Travis is no longer around. Samantha may just be very sensitive because she was sort of close with Travis.

      I honestly wish it would come out that Jodi didn’t do this at all. I wonder how they’d feel then?

  15. This happened 5 years ago. They seen and heard everything a dozens of times. The sisters still cry like this all just happened. Were they even close with Travis?

    • No they were not close to Travis… in the report it states they were estrangled from their brother for several years. This is all an act on their part…. makes me cringe…………..

      • And in 5 years if they had chosen to work on forgiveness & acceptance, instead of focusing on their chance at vengeance as the only thing that would help them, then they would probably feel at peace by now.

  16. What the FK ever Samatha…… Give me a break……… you fk drama queen. YOu all partied it up for 5 years in Mexico, Hawaii, CA and now your shedding tears five years later when you didn’t even have contact with your brother……

  17. The one sister is SO dramatic. She could be a soap opera star!! I love how she looks out of the corner of her eye to see if the camera is on her.

      • oh yes, I can see it now, a few months after the trial is over, they will be all over the TV, magazines, anyone who will pay for an interview. I’m sure there will be books, etc, anyway to make some $$ off it. Disgusting to say the least….

  18. What’s the older sister’s name? She looks as though she is TRYING her damnedest to get the tears going…fail…

  19. the photo enlargement is RIVETING. It clearly shows 2 figures next to Jodi kneeling. Fits the Mormon Conspiracy Theory.

  20. That is the tech guy that testified earlier in the trial for Jodi, the “sound” guy that testified to the audio recording from the phone. I didnt recognize him at first.


    Dawn Finnell

    Photography since I was 7 years old. I know all this – wonder why oh why this jackass would throw his lifetime away. watch idiot. public back-lash is tough. grin

    • interestingly enough Renee’ HLN did a story this am on “cyber bullying” w/regards to teens…hmmmm…guess they don’t want to talk about ALV and the hell that she’s been put through!! Shamefull!!!

      • I have to say Shameful is not the word that should be used; the BIASED is on the part of HLN. They are BIASED not a fair and equal part of the News community. I fully believe this is exactly why they are now separate from CNN as a news network. CNN/Turner Broadcasting made the right decision making them an “Entertainment” News because they make slanderous,and imaginary broadcasting.


  22. If there’s others there with Jodi, wouldn’t that prove that she is lying about being there alone? I guess I don’t know if this will help her or hurt her.

    • The photo has already been admitted into evidence…. this is new testimony that we don’t know where it’s headed right now.

  23. How long do you think Travis’ family practiced cryingin the mirror before court today? crying over seeing him look at the camera? Please I say 2 hours.

    • Why would there be two people when Travis is naked in the shower?

      It’s more likely something would show whether or not Jodi had a gun or a knife, i.e., premeditation or lack thereof.

      • that would be great TS, but what would that mean? A reduction of charges?? I don’t know that that would happen just because of the photo tho..

      • Hey you guys i don’t know if you know this but there is a video in youtube from an expert not associated with the case that DOES SHOW 2 PEOPLE IN HIS EYE> check it out i typed ” 2people in travis’ eye” and it came up.

        • It’s his RIGHT eye too correct Krista?? They only showed his LEFT eye in this hearing. WHY??? Each eye has different reflections. Why didn’t they compare the two??

          Why does this matter at all?????

      • Not if its like she said and they said they would kill her. I mean DAMN look what they did to travis. I mean they let her walk away the first time i doubt they would let her walk again if she ratted.

  24. I feel like this is going in SLOOOOOWWW motion. WOW. Hearts beating fast now – crap! I have to leave for several hours. Damn, Damn, Damn! 🙁

  25. Before I boycotted HLN Vinnie was talking about the prosecution having a Perry Mason moment.. I just sitting here thinking this might be the Defense having one.

  26. Man this could possibly eclipse the OJ trial in being the
    most craziest roller coaster ride of a trial ever!

  27. He said that if he were to answer that question it would be purely speculation, and I said to myself, well, hell….that’s what we do here! Go ahead!!! Don’t let that stop you buddy!! 🙂

  28. Just got in. What’s going on? What happened with Grace Wong?

    Someone catch me up please.

    Did they really get a reflection in the eye?

    • So far, the reflection he is talking about it of a person (cannot tell who because not enough ppi) but a person taking a picture, holding the camera midchest high … so in support of Jodi’s story.

    • As for Ms. Wong, she testified to seeing Martinez signing autographs. She said she is familiar with the faces of the jurors, and she did not think any juror saw Martinez signing anything.

  29. I saw a video on youtube of this photo enhanced and showed the reflection of other people on the bathroom. I wonder if this is the issue

  30. Holy Guacamole – I came in late and I read above about them looking at what appears to be two figures in TA’s eye? Is this real?

    And Good Morning, Everyone! 😀

  31. That was the Scientific evidence behind Our Lady Of Guadalupe the Reflection in her eyes I saw it on Discovery History Channel. Very Interesting. I had written a long time ago about this to an Attorney, asking why the same test could be used in This Photo as was used in Our Lady Of Guadalupe’s.

  32. Oh, geeze…here we go with Juan being a jerk to a witness. I don’t know why? this guy works WITH the police! Juan may need his help in a different case in the future.

  33. WTH Juan./……… trying to knock off another witness because you don’t like his expertise ….. FK YOU JUAN…………..

  34. early on in the trial remeber someone on HLN saying something about reflection in T’s eye but I just thought oh geesh here we go again……but now im hoping and praying it will help Jodi out!!!!!!!!

  35. Yes I saw the same thing. There were two people in the reflection. Could it be the guy that his wife committed suicide? Jodi remembers nothing after the gun shot. Or it could be the Mormon cover up of the century.

  36. Hee, Hee – this dude works for the prosecution office a lot! Now Juan wants to pick him apart. And of course Judge Pickles is allowing this rediculous questions!

    • I was asking myself the same question. Of course I am so lost right now on what I am looking at it’s not even funny. I am trying to figure out how someone could see well enough to draw the outline on exhibit 4. I don’t know how you could possibly put this in front of a jury and ask them to draw a relative conclusion of anything. I will freely admit this last half hour went WAY over my head.

    • He has nothing for premeditation, gas cans that were filled in California and apparently filled in Utah to get back to California and a gun that may or may not have been stolen from the grandparents or may or may not belong to TA.

    • It’s hard to follow, vebe. I think what is trying to be shown is that Jodi was not holding a knife when she took the pictures of Travis in the shower.

      I’m thinking the judge will rule against allowing this. I find this sketchy. You can’t create an image where none was to begin with.

  37. So this guy is good enough for Phoenix homicide and the army and numerous prosecution and defense lawyers but he’s not good enough for Juan Martinez.
    You gotta love this crap.

  38. …”you know what Mr. Massengil…I’m an expert in spotting assholes in audio, video and pictures. And in fact, I can spot an asshole from about 10 feet away……”

  39. Is it wrong that I wish for Juan to get run over by a bus? I’m sorry. I said it. That is mean. I don’t mean it. Really, I don’t.

  40. This is nuts! Now saying stuff about how well this guy sees? it’s not about his eyes, its about his equiptment! That Juan’s office uses to prosecute cases! WTF?

  41. This is so dumb. You know that if he found a reflection of Jodi with a knife raised the prosecution, HLN and the haters would be lapping it up.

  42. The hearing was only regarding his left eye. His RIGHT eye is the one other people have enlarged and stated they saw two images. There are obviously different reflections in each eye. Why didn’t they enlarge the RIGHT eye????

    What purpose does this serve??? Everyone is in agreement that Jodi took the pictures of Travis in the shower.

    • That is NOT what this hearing is about. There is NO evidence there were other people there. This is to show Jodi couldn’t have been holding a gun or a knife when she took the picture.

      It would be hard to keep the camera stable if she were taking the picture with one hand.

      • So tony, there will never be any talk of the other eye and what might be seen? To add to the case that her lack of memory may be due to other circumstances – to add to reasonable doubt she premeditated? Or is that not possible to bring this in at this point?

        Would be kind of fun to hear how many animal’s JM would see in that eye 🙂

  43. I’ve seen enough today. No way is this trial fair. I’m convinced the judge and the puny ‘rock star’ are in cahoots. Maybe the punk has something on her, wouldn’t doubt it. In any case, I’m not up to this pathetic show today.

  44. If this was an image of JA with her hand in the air holding a knife somehow I suspect asshole JM would have 20/20 vision and see that without outlines!

  45. FU*K!!!The Judge told that Wong lady to be there at 11 and and I thought it’d start at 11 and stayed overtime at work,WHY GOG WHY???
    I guess I missed some important stuff 🙁 🙁

  46. Next time Martinez runs into this expert at his office …..

    JM: “It was nothing personal”
    Expert: “I still don’t like you”

  47. In answer to JM’s last comment; Then can we say it would be up to the jury to decide what the true story is once we present the facts and NOT freakin’ hyptheticals?

  48. There must be something about his photo evidence that has Juan all shook-up. Don’t know what the phot can or can’t prove, but Juan really don’t want it entered!

  49. He’s such a mother fk-er……………….. he’s an expert………… and to explain to the jury about the phot. Gosh he pisses me off………

  50. simple fact is JM wants no part of the truth or any argument that HE could be wrong. All he wants is a “win” in this case and to hell with what really happened. He is disgusting. Everyone according to the delusional would he is in is that not one professional is qualified except for himself. UGH he annoys me beyond belief.

  51. bottom line is Juan does NOT want the jury to see this because it is more PROOF that Jodi’s story is TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!

  52. Obviously this expert is good otherwise he wouldn’t be hired by all AZ police departments and prosecutors offices

  53. When the pics frist came out someone on this site saw the reflections. I was able to see it blowing it up but someone with powerful equip such be able to do it and be clear

  54. If Juan saw a snout and a dog outline… he must have been seeing his own reflection when looking at the photograph.

  55. JM questioning the reliability when the witness just said that Maricopa County used the technology for two suspect vehicles in a double homicide. Does that then make the witness unreliable in a previous Maricopa County case?

    • No kidding – hope the defense lawyer in that case didn’t see this. Then they could say, “hey, even your prosecution office doesn’t think this type of testing is reliable!”.

    • I just rewound back a bit… why is there a MS Paint outline of TA drawn on whatever that picture’s supposed to be?

  56. JM is arguing that this type of expertise should never be used in the future by his own office and could lead to all kinds of appeals in cases where this expertise has been used to convict

  57. It was not a dog! It was Cinderella’s mouse Gus Gus! Cinderella decided that she needs to support her friend Snow White (after all, Cinderella was abused by her step-family. Gotta stick together).

  58. Is jury hearing is???? I’m about to tune in. I mentioned weeks ago I could clearly see 2 people in the eye pic. One was a close up of a man’s face (profile). There is a black and white on the hate site ( well there was dont know ifmthey took it down when it was clear it could back fire) that makes it much much easier to see.

    More reasonable doubt. They don’t even have to prove this…. Just make it a possibility. Roommates could have come home and finished him off if they thought they needed to help her. Maybe they could tell she was out of her mind and a fight took place and they thought he was suffering. Tried to blame the whole thing on her especially if she didn’t remember anything.

  59. I don’t quite get what this witness brings for Nurmi. So it says she was holding a camera at chest height.

    What does that do? Jodi already says she took the pictures. I’m still trying to figure out how it matters.

    Does this have something to do with timelines?

    Did the prosecution make a claim that this picture was taken by accident when the camera was dropped?

    I’m at a loss here folks. Anyone got an idea?

    • Claiming she already had Travis at gun point or knife point when taking the picture. The eye enhancement disputes that. She only has a camera, she is kneeling like she said, taking pictures. Camera likely did drop.

    • My thoughts are it shows that Jodi was not holding a knife. I disagree with using this witness though. I know for certain you cannot create an image where there wasn’t one to begin with.

      I have to give Nurmi kudos for using this witness who normally testifies for Martinez though. I think that would sway the jury. If Martinez can use trickery, why not the defense?

  60. Martinez, “You’re only qualified as an expert witness in 2 areas, sound and audio, correct?” Dafuq did he just say? Sound AND audio… Aren’t those pretty much synonyms, JM, you dingbat?

    • It undercuts any notion she had a knife or a gun at the time the picture was taken. She held the camera like you would hold a heavy, expensive camera.

  61. So if this *dog in his eye* pic is of the right eye might Nurmi be working to get the left eye image of two people into the trial

    • Wasn’t there a mirror behind Jodi where she was standing when she took the photo which would reflect her image? This would explain the “two people” reflected in TA’s eye…Just a thought…

  62. I just caught a bit of that live at lunch and OMG, I almost wished I hadn’t because I can’t get that asshole’s voice out of my head now. Why why why does he have to be a dick even at an evidentiary hearing? He’s soooo obviously playing to the camera. It’s really getting more and more ridiculous every day. This won’t hurt his case and it won’t help the defense much, if any. So why all the hullabaloo?


    federal rules of evidence

    rule 702

    Rule 702. Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if:

    (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;

    (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;

    (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and

    (d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.


    Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules

    An intelligent evaluation of facts is often difficult or impossible without the application of some scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge. The most common source of this knowledge is the expert witness, although there are other techniques for supplying it.

    Most of the literature assumes that experts testify only in the form of opinions. The …

  64. Can anybody explain – when the misconduct trial mentions all the above (throwing evidence, intimidating witness, leaking info) why does JM get to say it is ONLY about the autograph?

      • You got that right Maria. It really doesn’t matter what motion Nurmi brings against JM. It’s probably best to spend my time more productively than watching these kinds of motios because SS is going to come down on JM’s side. Also, it’s my believe that this judge has all along been bending to the public, the people that will retain her in approx three years. The same public that is the majority that believe Jodi premeditated a murder. The same public that watches HLN. The only hope I have left is a juror. I find the biggest fault for this circus with the judge.

    • I’d bet that is his goal which would explain the ‘get a conviction at all cost, damned the truth’ attitude.

        • yeah, I should have clarified more 🙂 (esp. given we were shown pictures today!) haha

          by pictures, I meant by Martinez stopping to take pictures with fans, signing autographs 🙂

      • In any SANE world NK but not in this case and this court. Sadly. It must be exhausting to have to do all the work Nurmi and Wilmott do and KNOW before you do it that it is futile.

    • Here’s the thing she’s not getting – this isn’t an isolated incident. This is about Martinez’s pattern of behavior. If she had been paying attention to Alyce’s testimony, maybe she’d get it.

      But like a lot of people who side with abusers, they would rather compartmentalize and sanitize every incident to mean nothing.

      • Exactly! I loved it when Nurmi said ”continuum” in Martinez’ behaviour,that’s what the Judge avoids to admit.There’s a continuum of misconduct,not isolated incidents.

      • Right on, MB, “compartmentalize and sanitize” makes everything into nothing. This is how abusers get away with their own garbage.

  65. Well who couldn’t see that one coming. Did you catch during the camera experts testimony that she started to say overruled and then changed to sustained at the last second. I don’t think she gives any consideration to the motions. She just talks.

  66. Trying to get through the first part of the day on DVR but from what I’m reading on here while doing so this case needs to be THROWN out! Whiteness intimidation !! Maybe that’s why AL needs to come back tomorrow to discuss this issue on record!!

  67. JK said on HLN the very first tme she spoke of the autographs that there was a juror pressent and that the juror saw JM speaking with press and such.
    I remember her saying that the juror was leaning agaist a cement wall.


    • I think she said she worried about what would happen if a juror saw this….. that is what she testified to. I am sure Nurmi would have played that clip if she actually said “I saw a juror” on air then recanted on the stand

  68. There were two separate mistrial motions. Martinez emphasize that.

    Mistrial due to jury seeing photographs – denied (lack of evidence jury saw it and that it would affect their decision).

    Mistrial due to witness intimidation (ongoing, being discussed right now).

      • No, this has nothing to do with the photographs. This has to do with Martinez signing the autographs and posing with his fans.

        She will make a ruling on the photos later.

    • No, this has nothing to do with the photographs. This has to do with Martinez signing the autographs and posing with his fans.

      She will make a ruling on the photos later.

  69. I knew that would be denied.

    I was kinda hoping she would give him a warning about yelling at witnesses and throwing things, but I guess she doesn’t see that as a problem.

  70. It’s crazy that after the witness tampering and intimidation and changing testimony. Aweful but think about how many Jodi Arias’s exist in the US and that’s the worse part. Many we don’t know about but this gives us a definite perspective.

      • I have to think KN is playing this simply to get it on the record. With what Pickles just said about a mistrial, this tape won’t cause that.

        • I agree, Kathi, this is exactly how JM has been acting to all the witnesses during the entire trial; arguing, badgering, intimidation and even testifying but, apparently, that is acceptable in AZ court rooms.

    • bystander, I really don’t think this judge will give anything to the defense…she is a horrible judge..and my lack of upper case “j” in her title is a lack of respect of her on my part..

        • Renee’ if there is a conviction, I think that it’s obvious that a higher court will see all the misconduct that has taken place, and verdict will be overturned! I have watched many trials, and this is the most outrageous trial I have ever seen!!! Sequestration from the beginning..jury is tainted..if JA is convicted, it’ll be reversed!!!

          • I believe the judge and JM know there is grounds for mistrial and they know they have the power to do nothing about it – they just want the conviction (if they can manipulate it) to appease everyone and if and when it is overturned the public will have forgotten about it.

      • What’s interesting though is that the haters can’t stand the judge either and think she’s biased to the defense. But whenever lawyers talk about her, they think she’s great because she’s not a second prosecutor and is letting the lawyers run the show!

    • He tones it down quite a bit in chambers but he is still the same nasty frog we have come to know and love(not!)

      • Oh he has helpers they just do not sit in court with him. An on the Defense
        side they have to have at least 3 on a criminal case I read.

  71. Does anyone find it odd that JM is not yelling and being totally demeaning on the tape? I could take him if this was the worst he got. Why does he turn it up 1000% in court? I mean he is still a jerk but nothing like he is in court.

    • He’s very polite by his standards and listening to the witness. Is this tape designed to be a contrast to how he acts in court?

    • He is trying to be as civil as possible,this being a face-to-face meeting whereas he turns on his acting tricks/antics/skills(whatever you wanna call them)to impress the Jury.It’s a performance,that’s all!He thinks that the louder he yells the more convincing he is gonna sound!

    • He didn’t sound civil to me at all. Sounded like he was intimidating the witness and forcing him to say he could explain without exhibits through intimidation.

      • I’ve always considered Prosecutors to be the good guys and the Defense Atty’s to be the bad guys. This trial has changed that around 180 degree’s. Plus the defense has to deal with a Puppet Judge who has shown herself to be incompetent and a jury that’s lying through there teeth when they say they haven’t heard anything about this trial outside the courtroom.
        If this was a fair and impartial trial and the jury was sequestered and they came up with a gulity verdict I’d be ok with that even if I didn’t agree with it.
        This is so far from fair and impartial I can’t believe it.

        • Me also. My mother worked for the DA for years an years when I was growing up.
          I never got along with her an after watching JM I know why now. She was always
          right even when she was wrong. An she told me before all Defense attorneys were
          slime etc. Now I see that truly a prosecutor will prosecute even if the defendant
          may be innocent of the charges as in Death Penalty for Self Defense WTH?

  72. When JM asked this guy what would be his response if JM said he cannot see an image in the pic, he should have said, my response would be that you are CHOOSING not to see an image in the pic. THAT would shut his measly little mouth up for a second. Oh of course he would then go crying to the judge like he always does.

    • That is what I was thinking too BevM. JM is not going to see anything even
      if it was directly in his BLIND face maybe he needs new glasses !

    • I don’t know Al, but I wonder what JM was discussing when he said that it is no wonder ALV was upset after what they discovered and talked about in chambers.

  73. *repost of mine from earlier

    He didn’t sound civil to me at all. Sounded like he was intimidating the witness and forcing him to say he could explain without exhibits through intimidation.

    • I agree with that she is. The eye rolls when reading the Jury questions
      an then looking over to JM an Flores proved that to me. Oh an the pierced
      lips like she hates even having to read the questions.

  74. I think he also INTIMIDATED AND ABUSED Jodi!!!! Piece of dog shit that he is….I NEED to slap this munchkin….

  75. the audio of the interview of samuels by jm has jm constantly interrupting samuels in his search for the result or the outcome he wants

    jm has no interest in the truth
    jm is irredeemably biased against jodi
    jm has a totally closed mind
    listening to this audio even when not in court, he relentlessly reveals his proclivity to be dishonest and twist the evidence
    badgering samuels, and all the other prosecutorial abuses revealed in court
    tampering with this witness
    a serious crime by jm

    jm seeks to shortchange the jury on the truth as long as a twisted, distorted and incomplete will achieve the state’s end

    a very damaging audio to any fair minded person

    jodi haters excepted of course

    witness tampering

  76. I am so tired of JM referring to himself in the 3rd person!!!!!! What does that title make him feel like a big man??

  77. I don’t understand why they can’t have FBI or CIA experts that do
    that kind of thing with the eye reflection verify it ? they keep saying
    there is no expertise in that field ?

      • Geez you would think one retired nice man or woman would see that
        an do it for free. I would what is wrong with people. I would be hunting
        a retiree in the field that had some compassion for helping out an
        did not hold any prejudice except to know that field.

  78. …but you know what? He is right (I have just thrown up) when he says it isn’t “prosecutorial MISCONDUCT” – it’s his CONDUCT ALL THE TIME- once an asshole always an asshole..


    She tweets through a 3rd party…!!!!! FU MASSENGIL

  79. its very apparent to me that this judge is more concerned about her reputation than she is about making sure Jodi gets a fair trial. Anyone who listens to Kermit, has seen his behavior, and has any ethical boundaries sees this is grounds for mistrial many weeks ago. Her only concern is that she is seen in the court of public opinion, as being the Judge who put Jodi away. Stupid bitch!!!
    She probably has a book deal too

        • Donavan said that they talk about things and they agree what to tweet.I personally am not convinced of that.Some of the tweets dont sound like Jodi to me at all.

          • It would still be the friends perception of what she talks to Jodi about and besides Jodi has no legal standards as a defendant as far as her trial and her conduct. He does

          • I agree JODI did not type it in there so therefore it was not JODI just
            her name on the account. I can make up a account with her name
            also an put things in there an say Oh Ya I am friends with her also?
            so dumb.
            WHERE is Byran Carr? remember that guy? all the time calling in
            to the JOKE NEWS saying he was relaying messages all the haters
            believed all that crap an JOKE NEWS too. Such CRAP !

        • Even if she wanted to do so,how could she have confirmed it?That’s why there’s a lot of speculation and the haters are having a party over this tweets-some sound offensive.

  80. If it was a dog don’t you think Jodi would have been attacked by the dog if she was unjustly attacking Travis unprovoked. Yes she would be attacked at that moment because (if you have a dog you know this) he loved Travis and Travis was his master he would have protected him from jodi if he was in the room. He would never let Jodi go after him . JM is a F*ing nut job. Who thinks Jaun will get another case after this fiasco ? Show of hand s ….. none. My thoughts exactly.

    • It’s only fair to say that Napoleon was not there during the killing.Otherwise,you’re right-he would have attacked Jodi in a second,despite the fact that he knew her and loved her.TA was his master and he was more loyal to him than her.

      • The roommates testified that there was a dog gate at the bottom of the stairs which they thought was odd since the dog was normally allowed free reign. Oddly enough, they never took it down. Hmmm

    • He sees a Dog LOL! he is so pathetic can they use the fact that he dyed his hair shortly after his media mania Can they put him on the stand.

  81. Pickles just rolled her eyes and then looked like she was going to fall asleep..discrespectfull!!! Excuse my spelling, I am pissed!

  82. Nurmi; “This isn’t second grade, this is a court of law.” But I think JM and judge beg to differ…

    As far as prosecutorial misconduct – I’m sorry but I think it is rampant. The prosecutor is not supposed to testify or put false arguments without evidence in front of the jury, as JM has done a number of times. It is blatant and it is on record.

  83. judge stephens if you rule against the defense motion remember the prosecutorial misconduct of nancy grace

    Prosecutorial misconduct

    The Supreme Court of Georgia has twice commented on Grace’s conduct as a prosecutor. First, in a 1994 heroin drug trafficking case, Bell v. State, the Court declared a mistrial, saying that Grace had “exceeded the wide latitude of closing argument” by drawing comparisons to unrelated murder and rape cases.[9] In 1997 the court was more severe, overturning the murder-arson conviction of businessman W. W. Carr in the death of his wife. While the court said its reversal was not due to these transgressions, since the case had turned primarily on circumstantial evidence, it nevertheless concluded “the conduct of the prosecuting attorney in this case demonstrated her disregard of the notions of due process and fairness, and was inexcusable”.[10][11] Carr was freed in 2004 when the Georgia Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Fulton County had waited too long to retry him, thereby unfairly prejudicing his right to a fair trial.[12]

    Despite upholding the conviction she sought, a panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in a 2005 opinion that Grace “played fast and loose” with her ethical duties and failed to “fulfill her responsibilities” as a prosecutor in the 1990 triple murder trial of Herbert Connell Stephens.[13] The court agreed that it was “difficult to conclude that Grace did not knowingly use … [apparently false] testimony” from a detective that there were no other suspects, despite the existence of outstanding arrest warrants for other men.[13]

    judge remember what was revealed about nancy grace in the supreme court of georgia

    and it’ll effect you

    Prosecutorial misconduct

    The Supreme Court of Georgia has twice commented on Grace’s conduct as a prosecutor. First, in a 1994 heroin drug trafficking case, Bell v. State, the Court declared a mistrial, saying that Grace had “exceeded the wide latitude of closing argument” by drawing comparisons to unrelated murder and rape cases.[9] In 1997 the court was more severe, overturning the murder-arson conviction of businessman W. W. Carr in the death of his wife. While the court said its reversal was not due to these transgressions, since the case had turned primarily on circumstantial evidence, it nevertheless concluded “the conduct of the prosecuting attorney in this case demonstrated her disregard of the notions of due process and fairness, and was inexcusable”.[10][11] Carr was freed in 2004 when the Georgia Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Fulton County had waited too long to retry him, thereby unfairly prejudicing his right to a fair trial.[12]

    Despite upholding the conviction she sought, a panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in a 2005 opinion that Grace “played fast and loose” with her ethical duties and failed to “fulfill her responsibilities” as a prosecutor in the 1990 triple murder trial of Herbert Connell Stephens.[13] The court agreed that it was “difficult to conclude that Grace did not knowingly use … [apparently false] testimony” from a detective that there were no other suspects, despite the existence of outstanding arrest warrants for other men.[13]