site
stats
Menu

Jodi’s Appeals Court Opening Brief – PDF

in Latest News by


A journey of 1,000 miles begins with a single step — or in this case, it begins with Jodi’s recently filed 342 page Appeals Court Opening Brief.

The first 163 pages deal with the specifics of the appeal, while the remainder of the document includes appendix & additional materials.

The conclusion is listed as follow:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
* CONCLUSION *
Reversal is required based on pervasive and prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct, the due process violations resulting from the court’s failure to control the media’s access to the trial, the improper admission of hearsay testimony that helped establish premeditation, the improper testimony from the state’s expert regarding Arias’s mental state that helped establish premeditation, the fact that Arias wore a stun belt throughout trial without justification, and the prosecutor’s exercise of peremptory strikes in a discriminatory manner during jury selection. For these reasons, Arias respectfully requests that her conviction for First Degree Murder be reversed.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 3rd day of July, 2018..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

.
Click here (or click the pic below) to open the PDF document in a new browser window.
.

jodi arias appellate opening brief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

UPDATE: The JAA Appellate Fund total currently stands at $104,174.56 — so let’s be sure to keep the momentum rolling throughout 2018, so the fund total can push on towards the ultimate target of $250,000. That in turn will help towards covering all the legal fees associated with appealing Jodi’s wrongful conviction.

All donations via Justice4Jodi.com go directly to the fund. It is also the ONLY website authorized to collect donations.

In addition, please DO NOT, under any circumstances, donate through any other website or Facebook page/group claiming to be “official” and/or acting with Jodi’s approval or authorization. The same applies to any “Jodi Membership Clubs”, groups or fake Trust funds that have been set up. These sites are bogus – they continue to steal money from Jodi’s future – and they should be actively avoided. If you are aware of any such sites, please help Jodi by clicking here and reporting them.

And remember… each day that passes takes us one day closer to Jodi’s release date…

we are team jodi - and we will be victorious

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Make no mistake.

Believe it.

Prepare for it.

Be part of it.

Leave your thoughts & comments below.

SJ
Team Jodi #WINNING <<<

Click the banner below to read Jade’s post – “Justice Denied: Why The Jurors Got It Wrong & How The Facts Decimate The State’s Case Against Jodi Arias.”:

Read - Justice Denied - Why The Jurors Got It Wrong & How The Facts Decimate The State's Case Against Jodi Arias
Click the links below to read Jade’s previous posts in the series:

Stephens, Sandbagging & The Six Month Crap-Fest
Corruption, State-Sponsored Murder & Twelve Angry Men

The Immaculate Deception: Exposed

Michael Melendez – Perjury Exposed
The Presumption of Innocence
The Great Mormon Porn Swindle

60 Comments

  1. Obviously, I have just learned something new from the opening preamble. There was a third instance of TA violence against Jodi. Apparently, in March 2008, Jodi tells him she is breaking up with him and he backhands her in the car… once again with NO WITNESSES!
    Another is when he is on his doorstep giving her the double middle finger when she pulls out of his driveway heading back to CA AND there is a “mean” text associated with this event.
    Too bad she didn’t get a picture of that as well as the splint that he helped make for her finger after he kicked her. That would have shut Martinez up!!!
    Lastly, I remember they did some rope cutting which is how the knife became a weapon of opportunity… I had not heard that the rope was discarded on the trip to RB’s house.

  2. SUMMARY

    ARGUMENT 1
    The trial judge’s failure to protect Arias sufficiently from the massive, pervasive and prejudicial publicity during her trial violated her right to a fair trial.

    ARGUMENT 2
    The trial court violated Arias’s right to confront witnesses and the Rules of Evidence when it allowed Officer Friedman to repeat statements made to him by Arias’s grandparents regarding a .25 caliber handgun that was allegedly stolen from their home during a burglary.

    ARGUMENT 3
    The trial court abused its discretion when she allowed the state’s expert to testify regarding Arias’s mental state at the time of the crime.

    ARGUMENT 4
    Arias was forced to wear a stun belt throughout trial, thus violating her right to a fair trial.

    ARGUMENT 5
    The trial court committed clear error when she refused to reinstate panelists after the defense brought the prosecutor’s improper peremptory strikes to her attention.

    ARGUMENT 6
    Pervasive and persistent prosecutorial misconduct denied Arias her rights to due process and a fair trial.

  3. The show on Oxygen channel is on tonight at 8pm and repeats at 11pm. In defense of… lets hope Nurmi says something that helps in Jodi’s case against him!

  4. Thanks so much for the “cliffs notes” Justus!!!! This really helps!
    First, I did not know she had to wear a stun belt??!! Were they serious????????
    These are six solid arguments that would likely get a new trial in many other states, including mine.
    The preemptory challenges were suspicious. How was Martinez challenges any different than targeting black jurors in a case involving racial issues?
    My question is.. Is any one of these enough or are all six arguments combined necessary to grant her a new trial?

    • In theory, any one of these is enough. But different standards apply to the various arguments, as explained at the start of each. For arguments 1 and 4, “structural error” is alleged, which if found requires a new trial. For others, if error is found,”harmless error” analysis is required, in which the state has the burden of proving beyond reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the verdict. Still others refer to an”abuse of discretion” standard.

      I’m still digesting the brief and will comment at length eventually.

    • Not only did she have to wear a stun belt every day, which for at least some of the trial was painful, she was also unbearably hungry and badly sleep-deprived throughout, due to Estrella jail’s meal and transport schedule. I find it ironic that Arizona allows defendants presumed innocent to be physically abused during trial in a way that would probably be held to be cruel and unusual punishment of convicted prisoners.

      Unfortunately, the defense didn’t object to any of this, so there’s no trial record except of a dispute over letting the jury see the restraints. The appeals lawyers managed to sneak in the stun-belt issue anyway under a category of error that doesn’t require timely challenge. Well done!

      • That’s a good start.. Based on this, there are three types of error with structural being the most important. It seems Jodi’s trial had errors at ALL three levels. I had privately believed that she would be hungry a lot due to her discipline about avoiding the carb heavy diet that prisons serve. I look forward to your comments.

        I would love to know the reasoning/rational behind the stun belt! That sounds malicious and possibly abusive. Jodi was never a flight risk or a violent inmate. What was the criteria for that???

        It appears her appellate lawyers are quite sharp as they included that point which I would almost bet is a constitutional violation at some level, especially if the inmate has not demonstrated any anger/violence in the courtroom. Once again, this is something that I have never heard.

        Well done on letting Jodi’s lawyers know about the Oxygen program. I will be watching that tonight on my DVR(hate commercials!!!!!).

  5. July 9 1980 Our world was BLESSED…..in truth there is JUSTICE…..and FREEDOM. Bless Her and all who stand by Her and justice/Justus …..Always.

  6. Wow
    haters must read page 149 ……even the rat had a reason to believe in ….ACQUITTAL……hence its hate /vile and rather unjust ways….
    So much for GUILT was NEVER in doubt or so believed a judge.
    A system broken NEEDS to be fixed….ASAP!

  7. HI TO ALL,

    I noticed on several interviews that Juan Martinez gave,

    One of the first question they ask is why did you misbehave….

    After all Jodi killed
    TA so now we must punish her & kill her
    cause she’s a brat,

    So i must bark, belittle, insult, Jodi
    just for that….

    But my question is
    a very simple one,

    Why did Juan bark,
    belittle, insult the defense witnesses one by one,

    They didnt know TA they didnt kill TA
    so my question is why?,

    And I dont know the answer as much as i try…..

    Juan will do anything so your life is ruined & destroyed,

    And therefore at
    MCAO Juan Martinez is still
    “EMPLOYED”

  8. The last argument of prosecutorial misconduct is most persuasive. It goes on for 50 pages and ends by saying “Each instance of misconduct, from accusing experts of having feelings for Arias, to insinuating defense counsel hid evidence, to making comments on the evidence to show his opinion why the evidence should not be believed, was used to weave the picture that no one in the courtroom could be believed other than Martinez.” It goes on to say “When an interviewer asked him about his harsh style of questioning Arias, Martinez stated it was part of his strategy to cut off the witness, to interrupt her flow, and to raise his voice at her. He went on to admit that without these tactics, there was ‘a strong possibility that [Arias] would have been acquitted outright.’ His decision to engage in the pervasive and persistent misconduct is not inadvertent or accidental, but is intentional.”

    • Of course, Mr. Juanderful’s ignorant fans believe such behavior is perfectly fine, even admirable, as long as it’s their guy doing it and as long as it generates the verdict they want.

      • You aren’t kidding Alan! That should really help!
        Watched the In Defense program with Kirk Nurmi… heard something that I need clarified. Nurmi states that in the beginning, he was with capital crimes unit. I had thought he was a sex crimes guy who got this case?
        second, he says that Jodi defied her prior counsel’s advice regarding doing interviews… I never heard anything about Jodi having any counsel when she did those interviews. Who was her counsel before Nurmi? I thought he was only counsel??
        he didn’t appear to say anything that we don’t already know although he is claiming Jodi blackmailed him and threatened him with career trashing if he left her case. Jodi had said in Hayden interview that Nurmi decided to “blow the lid off of Travis’ secrets and trash him to help her case… Does Jennifer Wilmott need to speak on this in the suit?

        • Lance, I believe as part of the public defenders office he may have been in the capital crimes unit. In his private practice he specialized in defending men accused of sexual assault (i.e., proving that accusing women are liars).

          • OK.. that’s what I got confused. I figured I had got it wrong when I heard Nurmi say he was in the capital crimes unit.
            BTW, what is the state’s deadline to respond to Jodi’s brief?

            • January 4. Then the defense has a few months to reply, then there’s oral argument at the CoA. If the CoA rejects her claims, after that comes post-conviction relief (PCR), also paid by the state.

  9. I do think that Jodi is guilty, but the media circus that happened to her was so wrong. I look back now and the dumb things like the After Dark crap show were insane. It all seemed crazy and fun to watch, but this crap. I do think she may be found guilty again, but the shit show around her trial is wrong. People who have done way worse crimes are already out of jail. Such a sad situation. 🙁

    • I believe she is too. She should’ve went with 2nd degree murder. She admitted killing him and bc of that she must serve time. In a murder trial you need a good defense lawyer. Not a public defender. As far as circus media. High profile cases always get that kind of attention. She’s not the 1st or last. Maybe if she didn’t lie on those shows it wouldn’t have been so bad. Going on the stand for 18 days was a big mistake. If she got parole the earliest she’d have a chance is at least 25 yrs. and that’s not a guarantee the parole board would grant her that. Look at the Manson girls. Susan Atkins was dying from cancer and they wouldn’t let her out. These appeals drag on for years and years. Good luck.

        • Before I came to this site today, I happened to watch an interview after the verdict. She said she didn’t want to go on trial. The day of Jodi’s sentencing Samantha said they would’ve settled with LWOP and no appeals but Jodi didn’t agree to that. She needs a good lawyer. If her appeal is denied, how many more appeals can she do?

          • Hi Tiffany,

            As Justus said, Jodi, for a brief time, was acting as her own counsel. It’s called Pro Se. During this brief time, she went to the prosecution and made an offer to plead to second degree murder. As I heard it, the family flat turned her down and instructed the state to pursue the death penalty because they believed the charge to be heinous. Jodi was forced to trial as a result to defend her life. She also needed a much better public defender who didn’t come into the case absolutely believing that she was already guilty and then only focusing on mitigating her sentence and nothing else. The U.S. justice system is about haves and have-nots. O.J. Simpson was a “HAVE” and that’s why he got acquitted. Jodi was a relative have-not and could not afford a private attorney. She was then at the mercy of whoever the court assigned to her.

        • Mormons run the show in Arizona. They considered T one of their own… in their racist cult, they saw a Hispanic girl kill a white man and did everything they can to influence the trial.
          She should have gotten 2nd degree at the most.

    • You are absolutely correct. Sammy “the Bull” Gravano murdered dozens of people as part of the job, was incarcerated in many places, including in Arizona, and has been released. It’s definitely unfair. The shit show around the trial certainly didn’t help her. Poor Jodi.

      • Hi Pixie,

        That’s exactly why we are here! Sammy “the Bull” Gravano did indeed murder dozens of people as a hit man for the crime boss, John Gotti. However, he was given a deal by the state of NY to testify against Gotti which is why he is not doing LWOP.

  10. I just happened across these saved files today – two JAII posts from Oct 29, 2015 by coldcase53. I think they are significant considering Jodi’s appellate arguments.

    ______________________________________

    coldcase53 says:
    October 29, 2015 at 1:14 pm

    WOW! Check out this 1999 Florida case. A second degree murder conviction was overturned and the defendant got a new trial because the prosecutor called the defendant a liar and undermined his credibility as a witness. The decision also said the judge should be admonished for allowing it to happen. How many times did Martinez call Jodi a liar and JSS let him get away with it?

    AG HEADNOTE
    Improper and prejudicial comments by the prosecutor
    It is improper and prejudicial for a prosecutor to call a defendant a liar and refer to his version of events as “lies” and a “cockamamie story,” especially where the defendant testified, the 3rd DCA said.

    Roberto Gomez appealed his conviction of attempted second-degree murder, citing numerous improper and prejudicial comments by the prosecutor that served to undermine his credibility as a witness. The DCA agreed that the comments were improper and constituted fundamental error, and said both the prosecutor and trial judge should be admonished.

    “With these types of comments, the prosecutor encroached on the jury’s job by improperly weighing in with her own opinion of the credibility of the witnesses,” the DCA said. “There comes a point and time in the conduct of a trial that the trial judge should and must intervene in the egregious conduct, whether it has been challenged or not. It is the trial judge who is the central figure in the courtroom especially in the eyes of a jury. The jury looks to the trial judge as the only neutral, impartial, detached participant in the trial.”

    For the views expressed above, we reverse the defendant’s judgment of conviction and remand for a new trial.

    http://myfloridalegal.com/alerts.nsf/Print%20Slip%20Opinions/51CA6298E230D0518525684E005B3AF5?OpenDocument

    ______________________________________

    coldcase53 says:
    October 29, 2015 at 5:36 pm

    “This is an individual who will stop at nothing, and who will continue to be manipulative and will lie at every turn,” Martinez told jurors. “It’s like a field of lies that has sprouted up around her as she sat on the witness stand,” Martinez said of Arias’ 18 days testifying. “Every time she spat something out, another lie.”

    http://news.yahoo.com/prosecutor-calls-jodi-arias-manipulative-liar-195750776.html

    Martinez also accused Jodi of having a past history of crime during his closing arguments in an attempt to erase one of the mitigating factors given by the defense. Her “past history of crime,” according to Martinez, was that she had committed perjury during the trial by lying and that she had lied to the police during the investigation (“lying to police is a crime”).

    We could probably find 500+++ statements where Martinez told the jurors that Jodi was a manipulator or a liar or a lying manipulator during the trial. I think by the end of the trial he had practically “brainwashed” the jury to that idea that she was a liar and they shouldn’t believe any thing she said. She had no chance at a just verdict. NONE!

    ______________________________________

    Thank you, coldcase53, wherever you are…

    • Perhaps another example of Florida (where Casey Anthony and George Zimmerman were tried) making Arizona look like a bunch of hicks. This doesn’t seem to concern Arizona appellate judges — but it should.

      Note, though, that Jodi’s lawyers concede, citing a case, that prosecutors are not absolutely barred from calling the defendant a liar during closing argument. So it looks like a judgment call, one that Florida and Arizona judges perhaps make differently.

  11. Hi Kristine,

    Welcome and thank you for your honesty and your civility. Just wondering – what in the evidence has convinced you that she is guilty? And do you think you are convinced beyond any reasonable doubt such that if you were one of the jurors you would have convicted her of premeditated murder? Just curious.

  12. Hi Kristine,

    Welcome as well! Jodi is guilty of a lot of things in this scenario. She is guilty of bad judgment, not standing up for herself when Travis abused her and cheated on her, not reporting his physical domestic violence to police at the time it occurred and several other decisions during the course of their relationship. She is NOT guilty of premeditated first degree murder. Her shame and panic at the thought of having her relationship with Travis as well as his other behavior caused her to lie much longer than even the police expect a defendant to do in order to keep that out of the public forum.
    I would invite you to read Justus Forusall’s “wiki” site that is an excellent breakdown of this case and lays out our stance. I believe that you may be surprised at what you will learn as I did.

  13. Many go for …a deal to avoid a trial that is stacked against them….very common in America where many have this odd lust to destroy…burned folks at the stake….lynched them from trees….and go out of their way at…. TRIALS to put any to DEATH! See Her show trial. Some think ANY taking of life is wrong….even to defend a nation or others…say one sees a person about to be attacked or being attacked …say in NYC….well someone must be calling the police…RIGHT??? To My logic it seems impossible that a man under attack only has wounds that show he was on the attack. A few wounds to the hands ….wounds to the chest and back….a head wound…..and last but most a side neck wound….with only the neck wound putting this continual ATTACK to an end. The main reason Her attacker died was because he kept up the attack….folks who are under attack would use any n all means to put an end to such….She did ,but he used his fighting skills for the attack…hence no forearm wounds that would have prevented wounds to the chest or neck. This She had no marks…how would ANY know that????…do some think that after SURVIVING an attack one has this need to count the marks. BULL SHIT on that logic. In America some think that any killing is wrong…imagine THAT logic in ….AMERICA……! A trial must be fair an thus just or it is nothing but a lynching/burning .Why the rat went beyond the facts and had this need to twist logic an truth as well as evidence makes one wonder if it knew this case was a win by just using the facts n just the facts…SEEMS NOT! But then it KNEW there was a book deal on its way $$$$. I would ask any to show in world history where one UNKOWN has been put upon with such hate ,vile, and lies to destroy them…..as I watched that joke of a trial all I could think was WTF America…..the U.S.S.R./Russia…..China…N. Korea could learn a lot about putting on show trials for az……this is way happens when the mob has its way with the courts.How odd few judges or lawyers know American history…IMPEACHMENT…..do any Americans know the reason for impeachment?????…now some headed to what some think the highest court think a POTUS must not be impeached….READ whan a certain FOUNDER thought on that who convinced the OTHER founders how impeachmeant was rather FAIR! America must get better judges who defend the rights of the accussed and NEVER the mob…the mob have no rights…they are the …mob. One must judge an enemy as fair as a friend….to do less shows evil. How do I KNOW travis was an abuser…I have seen his abuse…and his wounds that show him to be the ATTACKER….yes trained to fight but as many who are …didn’t do it all that well.

  14. Wow talk about looking to get VOTES…as some rather nut job judges pander for the votes to keep the $ rolling in….maybe judges and prosequtors need stun belts to keep them from going nuts on the job. Who would EVER make a deal with no rigth to appeal…but holding a d/p over them may work …more then a few innocents would take a DEAL rather then a 50/50 chance of getting a jury bent on the D/P which by the way they ALL were……no other way for a jury in az. to sit on a d/p trial. From the get go they want to take ones life right or wrong. Very much as N. America police are told to ALWAYS shoot to kill NO MATTER the threat…most have seen police do just that as most have seen many police just arrest the person…what kind of cop do you want to be confronted by???? haters are having fits on their hate sites over this appeals ….thing! No thing folks just part of the rules to seek redress for wrongful verdicts. Ask the know it alls and one would think there is no reason to have trials…if one is charged then they must be guilty…HANG EM HIGH. The good old days were not so good. mike must look to John Adams and His defense of them Brits…NOT GUILTY…and boy did Sam give John shit for that. A trial must be fair or it is not a trial…and that trial was a SELF DEFENSE trial. haters know it all just not history or facts horn lied on the stand 3 times in the 3 times kill…why would any Dr. do so???? Even the wound to the neck if he had stopped his attack may not have been fatal…blood still would reach his brain as only one side was cut. he kept up the attack and thus gave Her no reason to stop defending Herself. Ther must never be no love or hate in any trial or that trial is nothing but a joke….these days many think a trial is a contest…if only we had a go at that accused…..Well that in days past was called trial by combat and remember that a very fit man who was well trained and very prone to violence was stopped by Her. Some would like to think that is a lie…well wise up a view his videos that show him to be the ABUSER he was……back him back abusers…..let the facts be the judge not the I think She is this or that….trials are only about facts ,reason and logic that can stand up to tests. I could judge ANY person and give them fairness because that is what folks who believe in justice do….can ANY hater ever say such….opps haters seek injustice as it makes em powerful. Just listen to the wack jobs from Her jury on ABC and how they mocked the trial and Her as if it was just a show….well it was a SHOW TRIAL.

  15. Thank you Justus. Grizz, many years ago there was a judge in my town and everyone called him Hangman xxx (don’t want to put his real name just in case) lol…this man had no mercy even for misdemeanors or small traffic violations. If people walked in the court room a few minutes late, he tells everyone to sit in the last row and they will be called last. This judge would give you whatever jail sentence came with that charge, even 30 days!!! The only time he’d give a break was if you had your own attorney, not a public defender. Even then, you just save your butt from doing jail time but paid the maximum fine. To me it’s like bribing the judge. If your lawyer knew the judge well, no jail time. It’s crazy. You need a lot of money or know someone powerful to get you out of the mess.

    • Hi Tiffany,

      Unfortunately, there are many judges like this who get caught up in the power of their office. They have little or no compassion and believe that there is no room for breaks when they seem warranted. Another irony of Jodi’s case was that the judge, Sherry Stephens, had NEVER presided over a capital murder case. The state felt that she needed the practice!!! Believe that!!
      So they put her on one of the most watched trials in AZ history to allow her to “get some practice”. Jodi truly needed a private attorney to defend her for many reasons.

  16. While I happy to read the Appeals , I still believe it should have been sealed as per Jodi s request, in reading the numerous media coverage, the misconduct etc. All this information out there could again potentially create an unfair advantage in this case against Jodi. Another issue I have is that there was so much more to add to the Appeals that seemed to be missed or ignored . eg..Horn s perjury , along with detective Flores, the computer evidence that was tampered with /destroyed , that we heard more about in the second trial ..now totally ignored in the Appeal. Nurmi ‘s lack of proper representation , admitting he doesn’t like his own client , I feel a lot of very important information for a stronger case is being left out ..anyone else ???

    • As I understand it, there is a limit to the length of the appeal. I don’t know if it’s the number of pages or the number of arguments but I will find out. Accordingly they had to prioritize but I’m not sure what criteria they used.

      • Yes, it would seem there is a word limit on the document. ( I guess the appellate judges don’t want to be reading 15,000 page briefs arguing every possible objection under the sun – they are, after all, called “briefs”. I understand an extension to that limit was granted in this case, considering it’s length and complexity, and the attorneys apparently chose what they felt would most likely get a favorable response.

    • Hi Miss Janet

      You are so right about the lack
      of information that wasn’t mentioned in the appeal like
      Horn, Flores & what about the
      forensic specialist Neumeister?
      Martinez tried to disqualify him
      & shouting i have a witness
      that will come in here & testify that you purposefully broke &
      tampered with the evidence….
      and prior to that he blamed Jodi’s
      previous Lawyer Miss Schaffer
      that they were the ones who tampered & deleted stuff from the computer….and omg the list of corruption just goes on & on….

      does anybody know why all this was left out of the appeal
      documents?

    • I’m guessing that they limited themselves to claims that are (1) fully proven in the record and (2) clearly supported by precedent. If so, they probably felt that state perjury couldn’t be proven, nor state computer tampering. I wish they had included the latter in the misconduct argument (6). But otherwise, they did a very thorough job with what they did include.

      My top argument was Martinez’s lies in closing about porn traces on Travis’s computer. I begged them to include that and the “victim” argument. They may have felt the former was unprovable, but I’m really angry at them for omitting the latter. It’s true space was at a premium — the brief’s already twice normal length — but they could easily have found 3-4 pages for it by editing, especially since I think 2 of their 6 arguments are really a stretch.

      At any rate, they did a really thorough job on publicity and misconduct, which are the main reasons Jodi deserves a new trial.

      As for Nurmi, I think ineffective assistance of counsel is an issue for the PCR petition, which comes after this appeal. There’s sure to be stuff from his book there, I think.

  17. To answer several people’s questions, I have confirmed with Jodi that the roughly $12,000 from the Appellate Trust was spent, as the trust document requires, on expenses related to the criminal appeals that the state doesn’t cover — not on her civil actions. But she doesn’t want to detail these expenses publicly, as is understandable.

    • Hey Alan,

      If it is possible, can Jodi’s attorneys shed any light on how much her non-state covered expenses could run? Even a general answer would likely be very informative.
      I also agree that the police misconduct should absolutely have been included.

      • At this point, I doubt anyone knows, including Jodi. I certainly couldn’t get that information out of her appellate lawyers. Sorry!

  18. One after another the state was ALLOWED to push the lie with it’s exparts…or so called….det. stevo…..and its memory problems….their lack of finding porn on the hard drive…one must LOOK! Ane az. relies on such for evidence…..horn and his facts which just do not stand up to FACTS…Phineas????????? Any Dr, in America who does not know the most famous head injury in history needs more schooling. horn abd the certain kill…..talk about a paid mouth piece. jamean …what is the reason to allow her ever to become a Dr….I have never seen such hate in one twisted face. Talk about not being able to answer ANY question until worded as she wanted…other Dr.s must wonder what gave her a pass. she made all in her click look like SHIT. Did the state have ANY who did not lie to make the win???? The Freemans did say that travis was one abusive man..they saw it 3 times that day at least. Now chri$ did say it all, i would never help Her,She killed My friend (more minion) and yes She KILLED an ABUSER! Now ca$h being a man of faith would know it is his duty to help any n all in findind the truth…but there he sat and said he could care less if She was MURDERED via the justice system. ca$h knows full well just what travis was as sky KNOWS even MORE. Such evil allowed in a court. The rat of its own free will questioned Her so called guilt even after the verdict……READ its words. The appeals now MUST question his and his minions action…they can look at what ever they PLEASE…judges can an do just that. They are allowed to over ride any verdict of GUILT. Is so guilty then why all the corruption and misdeeds for a win??? Asolid case need only facts..a weak or non case needs all the (help!) it can muster or PAY! As for the length of the appeal..is it a paper shortage or reading skills on the part of the judges….didn’t take Me 12 hr.s to read it but then Iam not a twisted lawyer who has then neen to push hate as some twisted faced women do….and this thing writes books to HELP other women…SAY WTF NOW! Nothing wrong with a little dig…is there. So many freaks with so much time to push injustce and defend a KNOWN PEDO…and all know this from the pedo’s own foul mouth…=(

    • Thanks. I thought I was the only one who felt this way about Wayne Griz MacDonald. Whew. It’s impossible to decipher, right?

  19. I hope this appeal is successful! Good luck Jodi. You don’t deserve life in prison.
    On another note, I believe Mormonism is an extremely harmful cult. The way they treat women and minorities is appalling. (Just Google it and see!) I hope Jodi opened her eyes and has left that cult!
    You are loved no matter what!

  20. Wow so much for FREE SPEACH …..now as JUSTICE it’s on the list in Americas new order…odd how being nice in the two trials really did nothing until She stepped up and called them HATERS out….NO ONE SAVED Her but HER! Odd how some on this site think I am the problem not az, justice or MANY so called Americas who join mobs to lynch others. If any think My words will HURT Her appeals then the system of justice is FUCKED! As is America!!! Folks not SPEAKING up here in this case is the REAL problem. Do I lie in My words…PLEASE out Me ……. l. you seem to PLAY both sides or are just here to question Me……well post away on My actions….PLEASE! All should have a say. I must wonder why so many think being nice will work in a system of hate. Both lawyers in the two trials called Her a murderer more then a few times any REAL judge would have called them to the bench and demanded they DEFEND the accussed or FIRED them on the spot. Amazing how they keep it up…does any think them juries heard their ill spoken words???? Never in My life did I think America could go off the rails as they did in this case…NEVER…but off the rails they did…and for just what…an ABUSER…a PEDO…a FAILED man…and a user of FAITH! If My words are not truth based on fact call Me out ….ANYTIME. I must wonder about any who call me out as to why…..sad to see so many can not read english…but then they seem not to know the case…now why would that be???? Here to rile things up or here to help.

  21. Travis was never proven to be a pedophile. That’s hearsay. Wayne, it appears you get called out – a lot. You know the old saying…if so many people are saying you’re dead, perhaps you should lie down. It’s you against the world, apparently.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*

Latest from Latest News

Go to Top